1.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
2
3=================
4x86 Feature Flags
5=================
6
7Introduction
8============
9
10The list of feature flags in /proc/cpuinfo is not complete and
11represents an ill-fated attempt from long time ago to put feature flags
12in an easy to find place for userspace.
13
14However, the amount of feature flags is growing by the CPU generation,
15leading to unparseable and unwieldy /proc/cpuinfo.
16
17What is more, those feature flags do not even need to be in that file
18because userspace doesn't care about them - glibc et al already use
19CPUID to find out what the target machine supports and what not.
20
21And even if it doesn't show a particular feature flag - although the CPU
22still does have support for the respective hardware functionality and
23said CPU supports CPUID faulting - userspace can simply probe for the
24feature and figure out if it is supported or not, regardless of whether
25it is being advertised somewhere.
26
27Furthermore, those flag strings become an ABI the moment they appear
28there and maintaining them forever when nothing even uses them is a lot
29of wasted effort.
30
31So, the current use of /proc/cpuinfo is to show features which the
32kernel has *enabled* and *supports*. As in: the CPUID feature flag is
33there, there's an additional setup which the kernel has done while
34booting and the functionality is ready to use. A perfect example for
35that is "user_shstk" where additional code enablement is present in the
36kernel to support shadow stack for user programs.
37
38So, if users want to know if a feature is available on a given system,
39they try to find the flag in /proc/cpuinfo. If a given flag is present,
40it means that
41
42* the kernel knows about the feature enough to have an X86_FEATURE bit
43
44* the kernel supports it and is currently making it available either to
45  userspace or some other part of the kernel
46
47* if the flag represents a hardware feature the hardware supports it.
48
49The absence of a flag in /proc/cpuinfo by itself means almost nothing to
50an end user.
51
52On the one hand, a feature like "vaes" might be fully available to user
53applications on a kernel that has not defined X86_FEATURE_VAES and thus
54there is no "vaes" in /proc/cpuinfo.
55
56On the other hand, a new kernel running on non-VAES hardware would also
57have no "vaes" in /proc/cpuinfo.  There's no way for an application or
58user to tell the difference.
59
60The end result is that the flags field in /proc/cpuinfo is marginally
61useful for kernel debugging, but not really for anything else.
62Applications should instead use things like the glibc facilities for
63querying CPU support.  Users should rely on tools like
64tools/arch/x86/kcpuid and cpuid(1).
65
66Regarding implementation, flags appearing in /proc/cpuinfo have an
67X86_FEATURE definition in arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h. These flags
68represent hardware features as well as software features.
69
70If the kernel cares about a feature or KVM want to expose the feature to
71a KVM guest, it should only then expose it to the guest when the guest
72needs to parse /proc/cpuinfo. Which, as mentioned above, is highly
73unlikely. KVM can synthesize the CPUID bit and the KVM guest can simply
74query CPUID and figure out what the hypervisor supports and what not. As
75already stated, /proc/cpuinfo is not a dumping ground for useless
76feature flags.
77
78
79How are feature flags created?
80==============================
81
82Feature flags can be derived from the contents of CPUID leaves
83--------------------------------------------------------------
84
85These feature definitions are organized mirroring the layout of CPUID
86leaves and grouped in words with offsets as mapped in enum cpuid_leafs
87in cpufeatures.h (see arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h for details).
88If a feature is defined with a X86_FEATURE_<name> definition in
89cpufeatures.h, and if it is detected at run time, the flags will be
90displayed accordingly in /proc/cpuinfo. For example, the flag "avx2"
91comes from X86_FEATURE_AVX2 in cpufeatures.h.
92
93Flags can be from scattered CPUID-based features
94------------------------------------------------
95
96Hardware features enumerated in sparsely populated CPUID leaves get
97software-defined values. Still, CPUID needs to be queried to determine
98if a given feature is present. This is done in init_scattered_cpuid_features().
99For instance, X86_FEATURE_CQM_LLC is defined as 11*32 + 0 and its presence is
100checked at runtime in the respective CPUID leaf [EAX=f, ECX=0] bit EDX[1].
101
102The intent of scattering CPUID leaves is to not bloat struct
103cpuinfo_x86.x86_capability[] unnecessarily. For instance, the CPUID leaf
104[EAX=7, ECX=0] has 30 features and is dense, but the CPUID leaf [EAX=7, EAX=1]
105has only one feature and would waste 31 bits of space in the x86_capability[]
106array. Since there is a struct cpuinfo_x86 for each possible CPU, the wasted
107memory is not trivial.
108
109Flags can be created synthetically under certain conditions for hardware features
110---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
111
112Examples of conditions include whether certain features are present in
113MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS or specific CPU models are identified. If the needed
114conditions are met, the features are enabled by the set_cpu_cap or
115setup_force_cpu_cap macros. For example, if bit 5 is set in MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS,
116the feature X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT will be enabled and
117"split_lock_detect" will be displayed. The flag "ring3mwait" will be
118displayed only when running on INTEL_XEON_PHI_[KNL|KNM] processors.
119
120Flags can represent purely software features
121--------------------------------------------
122These flags do not represent hardware features. Instead, they represent a
123software feature implemented in the kernel. For example, Kernel Page Table
124Isolation is purely software feature and its feature flag X86_FEATURE_PTI is
125also defined in cpufeatures.h.
126
127Naming of Flags
128===============
129
130The script arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mkcapflags.sh processes the
131#define X86_FEATURE_<name> from cpufeatures.h and generates the
132x86_cap/bug_flags[] arrays in kernel/cpu/capflags.c. The names in the
133resulting x86_cap/bug_flags[] are used to populate /proc/cpuinfo. The naming
134of flags in the x86_cap/bug_flags[] are as follows:
135
136Flags do not appear by default in /proc/cpuinfo
137-----------------------------------------------
138
139Feature flags are omitted by default from /proc/cpuinfo as it does not make
140sense for the feature to be exposed to userspace in most cases. For example,
141X86_FEATURE_ALWAYS is defined in cpufeatures.h but that flag is an internal
142kernel feature used in the alternative runtime patching functionality. So the
143flag does not appear in /proc/cpuinfo.
144
145Specify a flag name if absolutely needed
146----------------------------------------
147
148If the comment on the line for the #define X86_FEATURE_* starts with a
149double-quote character (""), the string inside the double-quote characters
150will be the name of the flags. For example, the flag "sse4_1" comes from
151the comment "sse4_1" following the X86_FEATURE_XMM4_1 definition.
152
153There are situations in which overriding the displayed name of the flag is
154needed. For instance, /proc/cpuinfo is a userspace interface and must remain
155constant. If, for some reason, the naming of X86_FEATURE_<name> changes, one
156shall override the new naming with the name already used in /proc/cpuinfo.
157
158Flags are missing when one or more of these happen
159==================================================
160
161The hardware does not enumerate support for it
162----------------------------------------------
163
164For example, when a new kernel is running on old hardware or the feature is
165not enabled by boot firmware. Even if the hardware is new, there might be a
166problem enabling the feature at run time, the flag will not be displayed.
167
168The kernel does not know about the flag
169---------------------------------------
170
171For example, when an old kernel is running on new hardware.
172
173The kernel disabled support for it at compile-time
174--------------------------------------------------
175
176For example, if 5-level-paging is not enabled when building (i.e.,
177CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL is not selected) the flag "la57" will not show up [#f1]_.
178Even though the feature will still be detected via CPUID, the kernel disables
179it by clearing via setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_LA57).
180
181The feature is disabled at boot-time
182------------------------------------
183A feature can be disabled either using a command-line parameter or because
184it failed to be enabled. The command-line parameter clearcpuid= can be used
185to disable features using the feature number as defined in
186/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h. For instance, User Mode Instruction
187Protection can be disabled using clearcpuid=514. The number 514 is calculated
188from #define X86_FEATURE_UMIP (16*32 + 2).
189
190In addition, there exists a variety of custom command-line parameters that
191disable specific features. The list of parameters includes, but is not limited
192to, nofsgsbase, nosgx, noxsave, etc. 5-level paging can also be disabled using
193"no5lvl".
194
195The feature was known to be non-functional
196------------------------------------------
197
198The feature was known to be non-functional because a dependency was
199missing at runtime. For example, AVX flags will not show up if XSAVE feature
200is disabled since they depend on XSAVE feature. Another example would be broken
201CPUs and them missing microcode patches. Due to that, the kernel decides not to
202enable a feature.
203
204.. [#f1] 5-level paging uses linear address of 57 bits.
205