Searched hist:"796 a6b521d0eadb338adf8cf7e482351c3a8a7b4" (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /linux/fs/ ! |
| H A D | pnode.h | 796a6b521d0eadb338adf8cf7e482351c3a8a7b4 Sat Jan 16 18:28:47 UTC 2010 Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Kill CL_PROPAGATION, sanitize fs/pnode.c:get_source()
First of all, get_source() never results in CL_PROPAGATION
alone. We either get CL_MAKE_SHARED (for the continuation
of peer group) or CL_SLAVE (slave that is not shared) or both
(beginning of peer group among slaves). Massage the code to
make that explicit, kill CL_PROPAGATION test in clone_mnt()
(nothing sets CL_MAKE_SHARED without CL_PROPAGATION and in
clone_mnt() we are checking CL_PROPAGATION after we'd found
that there's no CL_SLAVE, so the check for CL_MAKE_SHARED
would do just as well).
Fix comments, while we are at it...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
|
| H A D | pnode.c | 796a6b521d0eadb338adf8cf7e482351c3a8a7b4 Sat Jan 16 18:28:47 UTC 2010 Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Kill CL_PROPAGATION, sanitize fs/pnode.c:get_source()
First of all, get_source() never results in CL_PROPAGATION
alone. We either get CL_MAKE_SHARED (for the continuation
of peer group) or CL_SLAVE (slave that is not shared) or both
(beginning of peer group among slaves). Massage the code to
make that explicit, kill CL_PROPAGATION test in clone_mnt()
(nothing sets CL_MAKE_SHARED without CL_PROPAGATION and in
clone_mnt() we are checking CL_PROPAGATION after we'd found
that there's no CL_SLAVE, so the check for CL_MAKE_SHARED
would do just as well).
Fix comments, while we are at it...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
|
| H A D | namespace.c | 796a6b521d0eadb338adf8cf7e482351c3a8a7b4 Sat Jan 16 18:28:47 UTC 2010 Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Kill CL_PROPAGATION, sanitize fs/pnode.c:get_source()
First of all, get_source() never results in CL_PROPAGATION
alone. We either get CL_MAKE_SHARED (for the continuation
of peer group) or CL_SLAVE (slave that is not shared) or both
(beginning of peer group among slaves). Massage the code to
make that explicit, kill CL_PROPAGATION test in clone_mnt()
(nothing sets CL_MAKE_SHARED without CL_PROPAGATION and in
clone_mnt() we are checking CL_PROPAGATION after we'd found
that there's no CL_SLAVE, so the check for CL_MAKE_SHARED
would do just as well).
Fix comments, while we are at it...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
|