History log of /src/sys/netinet/ip_options.c (Results 1 – 25 of 309)
Revision Date Author Comments
# 7b71f57f 03-Dec-2025 Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org>

netinet: Remove left-over sys/cdefs.h

These were for $FreeBSD$ that was removed a while ago, but these
includes didn't get swept up in that. Remove them all now.

Sponsored by: Netflix
MFC After:

netinet: Remove left-over sys/cdefs.h

These were for $FreeBSD$ that was removed a while ago, but these
includes didn't get swept up in that. Remove them all now.

Sponsored by: Netflix
MFC After: 2 weeks

show more ...


# 28aafeb8 31-Oct-2024 John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>

netinet*: Add assertions for some places that don't support M_EXTPG mbufs

Found while auditing calls to M_WRITABLE to see if M_EXTPG could be
removed from its checks.

Reviewed by: gallatin
Differen

netinet*: Add assertions for some places that don't support M_EXTPG mbufs

Found while auditing calls to M_WRITABLE to see if M_EXTPG could be
removed from its checks.

Reviewed by: gallatin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D46785

show more ...


# 685dc743 16-Aug-2023 Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org>

sys: Remove $FreeBSD$: one-line .c pattern

Remove /^[\s*]*__FBSDID\("\$FreeBSD\$"\);?\s*\n/


# 662c1305 01-Sep-2020 Mateusz Guzik <mjg@FreeBSD.org>

net: clean up empty lines in .c and .h files


# 6ad7446c 02-Jul-2020 Alexander V. Chernikov <melifaro@FreeBSD.org>

Complete conversions from fib<4|6>_lookup_nh_<basic|ext> to fib<4|6>_lookup().

fib[46]_lookup_nh_ represents pre-epoch generation of fib api, providing less guarantees
over pointer validness and re

Complete conversions from fib<4|6>_lookup_nh_<basic|ext> to fib<4|6>_lookup().

fib[46]_lookup_nh_ represents pre-epoch generation of fib api, providing less guarantees
over pointer validness and requiring on-stack data copying.

With no callers remaining, remove fib[46]_lookup_nh_ functions.

Submitted by: Neel Chauhan <neel AT neelc DOT org>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25445

show more ...


# 44e86fbd 13-Feb-2020 Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>

Merge ^/head r357662 through r357854.


# 481be5de 12-Feb-2020 Randall Stewart <rrs@FreeBSD.org>

White space cleanup -- remove trailing tab's or spaces
from any line.

Sponsored by: Netflix Inc.


# 8b3bc70a 08-Oct-2019 Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>

Merge ^/head r352764 through r353315.


# b8a6e03f 07-Oct-2019 Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>

Widen NET_EPOCH coverage.

When epoch(9) was introduced to network stack, it was basically
dropped in place of existing locking, which was mutexes and
rwlocks. For the sake of performance mutex cover

Widen NET_EPOCH coverage.

When epoch(9) was introduced to network stack, it was basically
dropped in place of existing locking, which was mutexes and
rwlocks. For the sake of performance mutex covered areas were
as small as possible, so became epoch covered areas.

However, epoch doesn't introduce any contention, it just delays
memory reclaim. So, there is no point to minimise epoch covered
areas in sense of performance. Meanwhile entering/exiting epoch
also has non-zero CPU usage, so doing this less often is a win.

Not the least is also code maintainability. In the new paradigm
we can assume that at any stage of processing a packet, we are
inside network epoch. This makes coding both input and output
path way easier.

On output path we already enter epoch quite early - in the
ip_output(), in the ip6_output().

This patch does the same for the input path. All ISR processing,
network related callouts, other ways of packet injection to the
network stack shall be performed in net_epoch. Any leaf function
that walks network configuration now asserts epoch.

Tricky part is configuration code paths - ioctls, sysctls. They
also call into leaf functions, so some need to be changed.

This patch would introduce more epoch recursions (see EPOCH_TRACE)
than we had before. They will be cleaned up separately, as several
of them aren't trivial. Note, that unlike a lock recursion the
epoch recursion is safe and just wastes a bit of resources.

Reviewed by: gallatin, hselasky, cy, adrian, kristof
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19111

show more ...


# a68cc388 09-Jan-2019 Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>

Mechanical cleanup of epoch(9) usage in network stack.

- Remove macros that covertly create epoch_tracker on thread stack. Such
macros a quite unsafe, e.g. will produce a buggy code if same macro

Mechanical cleanup of epoch(9) usage in network stack.

- Remove macros that covertly create epoch_tracker on thread stack. Such
macros a quite unsafe, e.g. will produce a buggy code if same macro is
used in embedded scopes. Explicitly declare epoch_tracker always.

- Unmask interface list IFNET_RLOCK_NOSLEEP(), interface address list
IF_ADDR_RLOCK() and interface AF specific data IF_AFDATA_RLOCK() read
locking macros to what they actually are - the net_epoch.
Keeping them as is is very misleading. They all are named FOO_RLOCK(),
while they no longer have lock semantics. Now they allow recursion and
what's more important they now no longer guarantee protection against
their companion WLOCK macros.
Note: INP_HASH_RLOCK() has same problems, but not touched by this commit.

This is non functional mechanical change. The only functionally changed
functions are ni6_addrs() and ni6_store_addrs(), where we no longer enter
epoch recursively.

Discussed with: jtl, gallatin

show more ...


# c6879c6c 23-Oct-2018 Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>

Merge ^/head r339015 through r339669.


# 7c328352 09-Oct-2018 Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>

MFH r338661 through r339253.

Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation


# 13c6ba6d 09-Oct-2018 Jonathan T. Looney <jtl@FreeBSD.org>

There are three places where we return from a function which entered an
epoch section without exiting that epoch section. This is bad for two
reasons: the epoch section won't exit, and we will leave

There are three places where we return from a function which entered an
epoch section without exiting that epoch section. This is bad for two
reasons: the epoch section won't exit, and we will leave the epoch tracker
from the stack on the epoch list.

Fix the epoch leak by making sure we exit epoch sections before returning.

Reviewed by: ae, gallatin, mmacy
Approved by: re (gjb, kib)
Sponsored by: Netflix
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17450

show more ...


# 7b71f57f 03-Dec-2025 Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org>

netinet: Remove left-over sys/cdefs.h

These were for $FreeBSD$ that was removed a while ago, but these
includes didn't get swept up in that. Remove them all now.

Sponsored by: Netflix
MFC After:

netinet: Remove left-over sys/cdefs.h

These were for $FreeBSD$ that was removed a while ago, but these
includes didn't get swept up in that. Remove them all now.

Sponsored by: Netflix
MFC After: 2 weeks

show more ...


# 28aafeb8 31-Oct-2024 John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>

netinet*: Add assertions for some places that don't support M_EXTPG mbufs

Found while auditing calls to M_WRITABLE to see if M_EXTPG could be
removed from its checks.

Reviewed by: gallatin
Differen

netinet*: Add assertions for some places that don't support M_EXTPG mbufs

Found while auditing calls to M_WRITABLE to see if M_EXTPG could be
removed from its checks.

Reviewed by: gallatin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D46785

show more ...


# 685dc743 16-Aug-2023 Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org>

sys: Remove $FreeBSD$: one-line .c pattern

Remove /^[\s*]*__FBSDID\("\$FreeBSD\$"\);?\s*\n/


# 662c1305 01-Sep-2020 Mateusz Guzik <mjg@FreeBSD.org>

net: clean up empty lines in .c and .h files


# 6ad7446c 02-Jul-2020 Alexander V. Chernikov <melifaro@FreeBSD.org>

Complete conversions from fib<4|6>_lookup_nh_<basic|ext> to fib<4|6>_lookup().

fib[46]_lookup_nh_ represents pre-epoch generation of fib api, providing less guarantees
over pointer validness and re

Complete conversions from fib<4|6>_lookup_nh_<basic|ext> to fib<4|6>_lookup().

fib[46]_lookup_nh_ represents pre-epoch generation of fib api, providing less guarantees
over pointer validness and requiring on-stack data copying.

With no callers remaining, remove fib[46]_lookup_nh_ functions.

Submitted by: Neel Chauhan <neel AT neelc DOT org>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25445

show more ...


# 44e86fbd 13-Feb-2020 Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>

Merge ^/head r357662 through r357854.


# 481be5de 12-Feb-2020 Randall Stewart <rrs@FreeBSD.org>

White space cleanup -- remove trailing tab's or spaces
from any line.

Sponsored by: Netflix Inc.


# 8b3bc70a 08-Oct-2019 Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>

Merge ^/head r352764 through r353315.


# b8a6e03f 07-Oct-2019 Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>

Widen NET_EPOCH coverage.

When epoch(9) was introduced to network stack, it was basically
dropped in place of existing locking, which was mutexes and
rwlocks. For the sake of performance mutex cover

Widen NET_EPOCH coverage.

When epoch(9) was introduced to network stack, it was basically
dropped in place of existing locking, which was mutexes and
rwlocks. For the sake of performance mutex covered areas were
as small as possible, so became epoch covered areas.

However, epoch doesn't introduce any contention, it just delays
memory reclaim. So, there is no point to minimise epoch covered
areas in sense of performance. Meanwhile entering/exiting epoch
also has non-zero CPU usage, so doing this less often is a win.

Not the least is also code maintainability. In the new paradigm
we can assume that at any stage of processing a packet, we are
inside network epoch. This makes coding both input and output
path way easier.

On output path we already enter epoch quite early - in the
ip_output(), in the ip6_output().

This patch does the same for the input path. All ISR processing,
network related callouts, other ways of packet injection to the
network stack shall be performed in net_epoch. Any leaf function
that walks network configuration now asserts epoch.

Tricky part is configuration code paths - ioctls, sysctls. They
also call into leaf functions, so some need to be changed.

This patch would introduce more epoch recursions (see EPOCH_TRACE)
than we had before. They will be cleaned up separately, as several
of them aren't trivial. Note, that unlike a lock recursion the
epoch recursion is safe and just wastes a bit of resources.

Reviewed by: gallatin, hselasky, cy, adrian, kristof
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19111

show more ...


# a68cc388 09-Jan-2019 Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>

Mechanical cleanup of epoch(9) usage in network stack.

- Remove macros that covertly create epoch_tracker on thread stack. Such
macros a quite unsafe, e.g. will produce a buggy code if same macro

Mechanical cleanup of epoch(9) usage in network stack.

- Remove macros that covertly create epoch_tracker on thread stack. Such
macros a quite unsafe, e.g. will produce a buggy code if same macro is
used in embedded scopes. Explicitly declare epoch_tracker always.

- Unmask interface list IFNET_RLOCK_NOSLEEP(), interface address list
IF_ADDR_RLOCK() and interface AF specific data IF_AFDATA_RLOCK() read
locking macros to what they actually are - the net_epoch.
Keeping them as is is very misleading. They all are named FOO_RLOCK(),
while they no longer have lock semantics. Now they allow recursion and
what's more important they now no longer guarantee protection against
their companion WLOCK macros.
Note: INP_HASH_RLOCK() has same problems, but not touched by this commit.

This is non functional mechanical change. The only functionally changed
functions are ni6_addrs() and ni6_store_addrs(), where we no longer enter
epoch recursively.

Discussed with: jtl, gallatin

show more ...


# c6879c6c 23-Oct-2018 Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>

Merge ^/head r339015 through r339669.


# 7c328352 09-Oct-2018 Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>

MFH r338661 through r339253.

Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation


12345678910>>...13