#
233353ec |
| 05-May-2015 |
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> |
Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/armbru/tags/pull-qmp-2015-05-05' into staging
drop qapi nested structs
# gpg: Signature made Tue May 5 17:40:40 2015 BST using RSA key ID EB918653 # gpg: Good
Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/armbru/tags/pull-qmp-2015-05-05' into staging
drop qapi nested structs
# gpg: Signature made Tue May 5 17:40:40 2015 BST using RSA key ID EB918653 # gpg: Good signature from "Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>" # gpg: aka "Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>"
* remotes/armbru/tags/pull-qmp-2015-05-05: (40 commits) qapi: Check for member name conflicts with a base class qapi: Support (subset of) \u escapes in strings qapi: Tweak doc references to QMP when QGA is also meant qapi: Drop dead visitor code related to nested structs qapi: Drop support for inline nested types qapi: Drop inline nested structs in query-pci qapi: Drop inline nested struct in query-version qapi: Drop tests for inline nested structs qapi: Merge UserDefTwo and UserDefNested in tests qapi: Forbid 'type' in schema qapi: Use 'struct' instead of 'type' in schema qapi: Document 'struct' metatype qapi: Prefer 'struct' over 'type' in generator qapi: More rigorous checking for type safety bypass qapi: Whitelist commands that don't return dictionary qapi: Require valid names qapi: More rigourous checking of types qapi: Add some type check tests qapi: Unify type bypass and add tests qapi: Allow true, false and null in schema json ...
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
show more ...
|
#
10d4d997 |
| 04-May-2015 |
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> |
qapi: Whitelist commands that don't return dictionary
...or an array of dictionaries. Although we have to cater to existing commands, returning a non-dictionary means the command is not extensible
qapi: Whitelist commands that don't return dictionary
...or an array of dictionaries. Although we have to cater to existing commands, returning a non-dictionary means the command is not extensible (no new name/value pairs can be added if more information must be returned in parallel). By making the whitelist explicit, any new command that falls foul of this practice will have to be self-documenting, which will encourage developers to either justify the action or rework the design to use a dictionary after all.
It's a little bit sloppy that we share a single whitelist among three clients (it's too permissive for each). If this is a problem, a future patch could tighten things by having the generator take the whitelist as an argument (as in scripts/qapi-commands.py --legacy-returns=...), or by having the generator output C code that requires explicit use of the whitelist (as in: #ifndef FROBNICATE_LEGACY_RETURN_OK # error Command 'frobnicate' should return a dictionary #endif then having the callers define appropriate macros). But until we need such fine-grained separation (if ever), this patch does the job just fine.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
0d8b9fb5 |
| 04-May-2015 |
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> |
qapi: Add some type check tests
Demonstrate that the qapi generator silently parses confusing types, which may cause other errors later on. Later patches will update the expected results as the gene
qapi: Add some type check tests
Demonstrate that the qapi generator silently parses confusing types, which may cause other errors later on. Later patches will update the expected results as the generator is made stricter.
Most of the new tests focus on blatant errors. But returns-whitelist is a case where we have historically allowed returning something other than a JSON object from particular commands; we have to keep that behavior to avoid breaking clients, but it would be nicer to avoid adding such commands in the future, because any return that is not an (array of) object cannot be easily extended if future qemu wants to return additional information. The QMP protocol already documents that clients should ignore unknown dictionary keys, but does not require clients to have to handle more than one type of JSON object.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
show more ...
|