#
ea738b21 |
| 13-Dec-2018 |
Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> |
qapi: add a dictionary form with 'name' key for enum members
Desugar the enum NAME form to { 'name': NAME }. This will allow to add new enum members, such as 'if' in the following patch.
Signed-off
qapi: add a dictionary form with 'name' key for enum members
Desugar the enum NAME form to { 'name': NAME }. This will allow to add new enum members, such as 'if' in the following patch.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181213123724.4866-7-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181213123724.4866-8-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20181213123724.4866-9-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> [Harmless accidental move backed out, long line wrapped, patches squashed] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
cf393590 |
| 04-May-2015 |
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> |
qapi: Better error messages for bad enums
The previous commit demonstrated that the generator had several flaws with less-than-perfect enums: - an enum that listed the same string twice (or two vari
qapi: Better error messages for bad enums
The previous commit demonstrated that the generator had several flaws with less-than-perfect enums: - an enum that listed the same string twice (or two variant strings that map to the same C enumerator) ended up generating an invalid C enum - because the generator adds a _MAX terminator to each enum, the use of an enum member 'max' can also cause this clash - if an enum omits 'data', the generator left a python stack trace rather than a graceful message - an enum that used a non-array 'data' was silently accepted by the parser - an enum that used non-string members in the 'data' member was silently accepted by the parser
Add check_enum to cover these situations, and update testcases to match. While valid .json files won't trigger any of these cases, we might as well be nicer to developers that make a typo while trying to add new QAPI code.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
ad11dbb9 |
| 04-May-2015 |
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> |
qapi: Add some enum tests
Demonstrate that the qapi generator doesn't deal well with enums that aren't up to par. Later patches will update the expected results as the generator is made stricter.
S
qapi: Add some enum tests
Demonstrate that the qapi generator doesn't deal well with enums that aren't up to par. Later patches will update the expected results as the generator is made stricter.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
show more ...
|