History log of /linux/lib/crypto/gf128hash.c (Results 1 – 4 of 4)
Revision Date Author Comments
# c417e704 19-Mar-2026 Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>

lib/crypto: gf128hash: Add GHASH support

Add GHASH support to the gf128hash module.

This will replace the GHASH support in the crypto_shash API. It will be
used by the "gcm" template and by the AE

lib/crypto: gf128hash: Add GHASH support

Add GHASH support to the gf128hash module.

This will replace the GHASH support in the crypto_shash API. It will be
used by the "gcm" template and by the AES-GCM library (when an
arch-optimized implementation of the full AES-GCM is unavailable).

This consists of a simple API that mirrors the existing POLYVAL API, a
generic implementation of that API based on the existing efficient and
side-channel-resistant polyval_mul_generic(), and the framework for
architecture-optimized implementations of the GHASH functions.

The GHASH accumulator is stored in POLYVAL format rather than GHASH
format, since this is what most modern GHASH implementations actually
need. The few implementations that expect the accumulator in GHASH
format will just convert the accumulator to/from GHASH format
temporarily. (Supporting architecture-specific accumulator formats
would be possible, but doesn't seem worth the complexity.)

However, architecture-specific formats of struct ghash_key will be
supported, since a variety of formats will be needed there anyway. The
default format is just the key in POLYVAL format.

Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260319061723.1140720-4-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>

show more ...


# b3b6e8f9 19-Mar-2026 Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>

lib/crypto: gf128hash: Support GF128HASH_ARCH without all POLYVAL functions

Currently, some architectures (arm64 and x86) have optimized code for
both GHASH and POLYVAL. Others (arm, powerpc, riscv

lib/crypto: gf128hash: Support GF128HASH_ARCH without all POLYVAL functions

Currently, some architectures (arm64 and x86) have optimized code for
both GHASH and POLYVAL. Others (arm, powerpc, riscv, and s390) have
optimized code only for GHASH. While POLYVAL support could be
implemented on these other architectures, until then we need to support
the case where arch-optimized functions are present only for GHASH.

Therefore, update the support for arch-optimized POLYVAL functions to
allow architectures to opt into supporting these functions individually.

The new meaning of CONFIG_CRYPTO_LIB_GF128HASH_ARCH is that some level
of GHASH and/or POLYVAL acceleration is provided.

Also provide an implementation of polyval_mul() based on
polyval_blocks_arch(), for when polyval_mul_arch() isn't implemented.

Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260319061723.1140720-3-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>

show more ...


# 61f66c52 19-Mar-2026 Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>

lib/crypto: gf128hash: Rename polyval module to gf128hash

Currently, the standalone GHASH code is coupled with crypto_shash. This
has resulted in unnecessary complexity and overhead, as well as the

lib/crypto: gf128hash: Rename polyval module to gf128hash

Currently, the standalone GHASH code is coupled with crypto_shash. This
has resulted in unnecessary complexity and overhead, as well as the code
being unavailable to library code such as the AES-GCM library. Like was
done with POLYVAL, it needs to find a new home in lib/crypto/.

GHASH and POLYVAL are closely related and can each be implemented in
terms of each other. Optimized code for one can be reused with the
other. But also since GHASH tends to be difficult to implement directly
due to its unnatural bit order, most modern GHASH implementations
(including the existing arm, arm64, powerpc, and x86 optimized GHASH
code, and the new generic GHASH code I'll be adding) actually
reinterpret the GHASH computation as an equivalent POLYVAL computation,
pre and post-processing the inputs and outputs to map to/from POLYVAL.

Given this close relationship, it makes sense to group the GHASH and
POLYVAL code together in the same module. This gives us a wide range of
options for implementing them, reusing code between the two and properly
utilizing whatever instructions each architecture provides.

Thus, GHASH support will be added to the library module that is
currently called "polyval". Rename it to an appropriate name:
"gf128hash". Rename files, options, functions, etc. where appropriate
to reflect the upcoming sharing with GHASH. (Note: polyval_kunit is not
renamed, as ghash_kunit will be added alongside it instead.)

Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260319061723.1140720-2-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>

show more ...


# 3d176751 09-Nov-2025 Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>

lib/crypto: polyval: Add POLYVAL library

Add support for POLYVAL to lib/crypto/.

This will replace the polyval crypto_shash algorithm and its use in the
hctr2 template, simplifying the code and red

lib/crypto: polyval: Add POLYVAL library

Add support for POLYVAL to lib/crypto/.

This will replace the polyval crypto_shash algorithm and its use in the
hctr2 template, simplifying the code and reducing overhead.

Specifically, this commit introduces the POLYVAL library API and a
generic implementation of it. Later commits will migrate the existing
architecture-optimized implementations of POLYVAL into lib/crypto/ and
add a KUnit test suite.

I've also rewritten the generic implementation completely, using a more
modern approach instead of the traditional table-based approach. It's
now constant-time, requires no precomputation or dynamic memory
allocations, decreases the per-key memory usage from 4096 bytes to 16
bytes, and is faster than the old polyval-generic even on bulk data
reusing the same key (at least on x86_64, where I measured 15% faster).
We should do this for GHASH too, but for now just do it for POLYVAL.

Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251109234726.638437-3-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>

show more ...