#
d4123fdd |
| 22-Jun-2021 |
Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org> |
Merge branch 's390x-pull-2021-22-06' into 'master'
s390x-pull-2021-22-06
See merge request kvm-unit-tests/kvm-unit-tests!11
|
#
1b2c0437 |
| 11-Jun-2021 |
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> |
s390x: lib: add and use macros for control register bits
Add CTL0_* and CTL2_* macros for specific control register bits.
Replace all hardcoded values in the library and in the existing testcases s
s390x: lib: add and use macros for control register bits
Add CTL0_* and CTL2_* macros for specific control register bits.
Replace all hardcoded values in the library and in the existing testcases so that they use the new macros.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20210611140705.553307-2-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
show more ...
|
#
eb5a1bba |
| 09-Jun-2021 |
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> |
s390x: unify header guards
Standardize header guards to _ASMS390X_HEADER_H_, _S390X_HEADER_H_, and S390X_HEADER_H, respectively.
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David
s390x: unify header guards
Standardize header guards to _ASMS390X_HEADER_H_, _S390X_HEADER_H_, and S390X_HEADER_H, respectively.
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20210609143712.60933-7-cohuck@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
c9a34447 |
| 20-Jan-2021 |
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
Merge tag 's390x-2021-20-01' of https://gitlab.com/frankja/kvm-unit-tests into HEAD
* Moved to SPDX license identifiers and cleaning up license * Added test_bit(_inv)() & SCLP feature bit checking *
Merge tag 's390x-2021-20-01' of https://gitlab.com/frankja/kvm-unit-tests into HEAD
* Moved to SPDX license identifiers and cleaning up license * Added test_bit(_inv)() & SCLP feature bit checking * Added first SIE lib and test for nesting tests * Added diag318 emulation test * Small UV fix
show more ...
|
#
6c9f99df |
| 07-Dec-2020 |
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> |
s390x: lib: Move to GPL 2 and SPDX license identifiers
In the past we had some issues when developers wanted to use code snippets or constants from the kernel in a test or in the library. To remedy
s390x: lib: Move to GPL 2 and SPDX license identifiers
In the past we had some issues when developers wanted to use code snippets or constants from the kernel in a test or in the library. To remedy that the s390x maintainers decided to move all files to GPL 2 (if possible).
At the same time let's move to SPDX identifiers as they are much nicer to read.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
show more ...
|
#
dfe993b0 |
| 28-Sep-2018 |
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> |
s390x: Make code compilable with -Wmissing-prototypes and -Wstrict-prototypes
Include the right header in mmu.c to make sure that the implementations match the prototypes, and avoid old-style declar
s390x: Make code compilable with -Wmissing-prototypes and -Wstrict-prototypes
Include the right header in mmu.c to make sure that the implementations match the prototypes, and avoid old-style declaration in float.h.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1538123582-17442-4-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
2d0d5f41 |
| 24-Aug-2018 |
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> |
s390x: test if the DXC is correctly stored
This was not properly handled in TCG for all DATA exceptions. Let's use a simple example.
CRT produced a trap via a DATA exception with DXC 0xff, when in
s390x: test if the DXC is correctly stored
This was not properly handled in TCG for all DATA exceptions. Let's use a simple example.
CRT produced a trap via a DATA exception with DXC 0xff, when in this case both registers are equal (which is the case because we are using the same register).
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20180824115059.1517-5-david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
show more ...
|