#
a299895b |
| 06-Dec-2019 |
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> |
Switch the order of the parameters in report() and report_xfail()
Commit c09c54c66b1df ("lib: use an argument which doesn't require default argument promotion") fixed a warning that occurs with Clan
Switch the order of the parameters in report() and report_xfail()
Commit c09c54c66b1df ("lib: use an argument which doesn't require default argument promotion") fixed a warning that occurs with Clang, but introduced a regression: If the "pass" parameter is a value which has only set the condition bits in the upper 32 bits of a 64 bit value, the condition is now false since the value is truncated to "unsigned int" so that the upper bits are simply discarded.
We fixed it by reverting the commit, but that of course also means trouble with Clang again. We can not use "bool" if it is the last parameter before the variable argument list. The proper fix is to swap the parameters around and make the format string the last parameter.
This patch (except the changes in lib/libcflat.h and lib/report.c and some rebase conflicts along the way) has basically been created with following coccinelle script (with some additional manual tweaking of long and disabled lines afterwards):
@@ expression fmt; expression pass; expression list args; @@ report( -fmt, pass +pass, fmt , args);
@@ expression fmt; expression pass; expression list args; @@ report_xfail( -fmt, xfail, pass +xfail, pass, fmt , args);
Tested-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20191206113102.14914-1-thuth@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
da5b8576 |
| 04-Oct-2019 |
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> |
arm: Add missing test name prefix calls
When running the unit tests in TAP mode (./run_tests.sh -t), every single test result is printed. This works fine for most tests which use the reporting prefi
arm: Add missing test name prefix calls
When running the unit tests in TAP mode (./run_tests.sh -t), every single test result is printed. This works fine for most tests which use the reporting prefix feature to indicate the actual test name. However psci and pci were missing those names, so the reporting left people scratching their head what was actually tested: ... ok 74 - invalid-function ok 75 - affinity-info-on ok 76 - affinity-info-off ok 77 - cpu-on
Push a "psci" prefix before running those tests to make those report lines more descriptive. While at it, do the same for pci, even though it is less ambigious there. Also the GIC ITARGETSR test was missing a report_prefix_pop().
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
24f588e7 |
| 02-Dec-2016 |
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> |
arm/pci-test: skip on pci/pci-testdev probe failure
Some configurations don't have pci or pci-testdev. This patch avoids saying FAIL in those cases. Instead we get SKIP.
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agor
arm/pci-test: skip on pci/pci-testdev probe failure
Some configurations don't have pci or pci-testdev. This patch avoids saying FAIL in those cases. Instead we get SKIP.
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
f7f81c6a |
| 07-Nov-2016 |
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com> |
arm/arm64: pci: Add pci-testdev PCI device operation test
Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peter
arm/arm64: pci: Add pci-testdev PCI device operation test
Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com> Message-Id: <7d7e8f320a5de2f9201c3d21f88dc63520ea41aa.1478512824.git.agordeev@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
show more ...
|