1Objtool 2======= 3 4The kernel CONFIG_OBJTOOL option enables a host tool named 'objtool' 5which runs at compile time. It can do various validations and 6transformations on .o files. 7 8Objtool has become an integral part of the x86-64 kernel toolchain. The 9kernel depends on it for a variety of security and performance features 10(and other types of features as well). 11 12 13Features 14-------- 15 16Objtool has the following features: 17 18- Stack unwinding metadata validation -- useful for helping to ensure 19 stack traces are reliable for live patching 20 21- ORC unwinder metadata generation -- a faster and more precise 22 alternative to frame pointer based unwinding 23 24- Retpoline validation -- ensures that all indirect calls go through 25 retpoline thunks, for Spectre v2 mitigations 26 27- Retpoline call site annotation -- annotates all retpoline thunk call 28 sites, enabling the kernel to patch them inline, to prevent "thunk 29 funneling" for both security and performance reasons 30 31- Return thunk validation -- validates return thunks are used for 32 certain CPU mitigations including Retbleed and SRSO 33 34- Return thunk annotation -- annotates all return thunk sites so kernel 35 can patch them inline, depending on enabled mitigations 36 37- Return thunk untraining validation -- validate that all entry paths 38 untrain a "safe return" before the first return (or call) 39 40- Non-instrumentation validation -- validates non-instrumentable 41 ("noinstr") code rules, preventing instrumentation in low-level C 42 entry code 43 44- Static call annotation -- annotates static call sites, enabling the 45 kernel to implement inline static calls, a faster alternative to some 46 indirect branches 47 48- Uaccess validation -- validates uaccess rules for a proper 49 implementation of Supervisor Mode Access Protection (SMAP) 50 51- Straight Line Speculation validation -- validates certain SLS 52 mitigations 53 54- Indirect Branch Tracking validation -- validates Intel CET IBT rules 55 to ensure that all functions referenced by function pointers have 56 corresponding ENDBR instructions 57 58- Indirect Branch Tracking annotation -- annotates unused ENDBR 59 instruction sites, enabling the kernel to "seal" them (replace them 60 with NOPs) to further harden IBT 61 62- Function entry annotation -- annotates function entries, enabling 63 kernel function tracing 64 65- Function preamble (prefix) annotation and/or symbol generation -- used 66 for FineIBT and call depth tracking 67 68- Other toolchain hacks which will go unmentioned at this time... 69 70Each feature can be enabled individually or in combination using the 71objtool cmdline. 72 73 74Objects 75------- 76 77Typically, objtool runs on every translation unit (TU, aka ".o file") in 78the kernel. If a TU is part of a kernel module, the '--module' option 79is added. 80 81However: 82 83- If noinstr validation is enabled, it also runs on vmlinux.o, with all 84 options removed and '--noinstr' added. 85 86- If IBT or LTO is enabled, it doesn't run on TUs at all. Instead it 87 runs on vmlinux.o and linked modules, with all options. 88 89In summary: 90 91 A) Legacy mode: 92 TU: objtool [--module] <options> 93 vmlinux: N/A 94 module: N/A 95 96 B) CONFIG_NOINSTR_VALIDATION=y && !(CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT=y || CONFIG_LTO=y): 97 TU: objtool [--module] <options> // no --noinstr 98 vmlinux: objtool --noinstr // other options removed 99 module: N/A 100 101 C) CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT=y || CONFIG_LTO=y: 102 TU: N/A 103 vmlinux: objtool --noinstr <options> 104 module: objtool --module --noinstr <options> 105 106 107Stack validation 108---------------- 109 110Objtool's stack validation feature analyzes every .o file and ensures 111the validity of its stack metadata. It enforces a set of rules on asm 112code and C inline assembly code so that stack traces can be reliable. 113 114For each function, it recursively follows all possible code paths and 115validates the correct frame pointer state at each instruction. 116 117It also follows code paths involving special sections, like 118.altinstructions, __jump_table, and __ex_table, which can add 119alternative execution paths to a given instruction (or set of 120instructions). Similarly, it knows how to follow switch statements, for 121which gcc sometimes uses jump tables. 122 123Here are some of the benefits of validating stack metadata: 124 125a) More reliable stack traces for frame pointer enabled kernels 126 127 Frame pointers are used for debugging purposes. They allow runtime 128 code and debug tools to be able to walk the stack to determine the 129 chain of function call sites that led to the currently executing 130 code. 131 132 For some architectures, frame pointers are enabled by 133 CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER. For some other architectures they may be 134 required by the ABI (sometimes referred to as "backchain pointers"). 135 136 For C code, gcc automatically generates instructions for setting up 137 frame pointers when the -fno-omit-frame-pointer option is used. 138 139 But for asm code, the frame setup instructions have to be written by 140 hand, which most people don't do. So the end result is that 141 CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is honored for C code but not for most asm code. 142 143 For stack traces based on frame pointers to be reliable, all 144 functions which call other functions must first create a stack frame 145 and update the frame pointer. If a first function doesn't properly 146 create a stack frame before calling a second function, the *caller* 147 of the first function will be skipped on the stack trace. 148 149 For example, consider the following example backtrace with frame 150 pointers enabled: 151 152 [<ffffffff81812584>] dump_stack+0x4b/0x63 153 [<ffffffff812d6dc2>] cmdline_proc_show+0x12/0x30 154 [<ffffffff8127f568>] seq_read+0x108/0x3e0 155 [<ffffffff812cce62>] proc_reg_read+0x42/0x70 156 [<ffffffff81256197>] __vfs_read+0x37/0x100 157 [<ffffffff81256b16>] vfs_read+0x86/0x130 158 [<ffffffff81257898>] SyS_read+0x58/0xd0 159 [<ffffffff8181c1f2>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x76 160 161 It correctly shows that the caller of cmdline_proc_show() is 162 seq_read(). 163 164 If we remove the frame pointer logic from cmdline_proc_show() by 165 replacing the frame pointer related instructions with nops, here's 166 what it looks like instead: 167 168 [<ffffffff81812584>] dump_stack+0x4b/0x63 169 [<ffffffff812d6dc2>] cmdline_proc_show+0x12/0x30 170 [<ffffffff812cce62>] proc_reg_read+0x42/0x70 171 [<ffffffff81256197>] __vfs_read+0x37/0x100 172 [<ffffffff81256b16>] vfs_read+0x86/0x130 173 [<ffffffff81257898>] SyS_read+0x58/0xd0 174 [<ffffffff8181c1f2>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x76 175 176 Notice that cmdline_proc_show()'s caller, seq_read(), has been 177 skipped. Instead the stack trace seems to show that 178 cmdline_proc_show() was called by proc_reg_read(). 179 180 The benefit of objtool here is that because it ensures that *all* 181 functions honor CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER, no functions will ever[*] be 182 skipped on a stack trace. 183 184 [*] unless an interrupt or exception has occurred at the very 185 beginning of a function before the stack frame has been created, 186 or at the very end of the function after the stack frame has been 187 destroyed. This is an inherent limitation of frame pointers. 188 189b) ORC (Oops Rewind Capability) unwind table generation 190 191 An alternative to frame pointers and DWARF, ORC unwind data can be 192 used to walk the stack. Unlike frame pointers, ORC data is out of 193 band. So it doesn't affect runtime performance and it can be 194 reliable even when interrupts or exceptions are involved. 195 196 For more details, see Documentation/arch/x86/orc-unwinder.rst. 197 198c) Higher live patching compatibility rate 199 200 Livepatch has an optional "consistency model", which is needed for 201 more complex patches. In order for the consistency model to work, 202 stack traces need to be reliable (or an unreliable condition needs to 203 be detectable). Objtool makes that possible. 204 205 For more details, see the livepatch documentation in the Linux kernel 206 source tree at Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst. 207 208To achieve the validation, objtool enforces the following rules: 209 2101. Each callable function must be annotated as such with the ELF 211 function type. In asm code, this is typically done using the 212 SYM_FUNC_{START,END} macros. If objtool finds a return instruction 213 outside of a function, it flags an error since that usually indicates 214 callable code which should be annotated accordingly. 215 216 This rule is needed so that objtool can properly identify each 217 callable function in order to analyze its stack metadata. 218 2192. Conversely, each section of code which is *not* callable, or is 220 otherwise doing funny things with the stack or registers, should 221 *not* be annotated as an ELF function. Rather, SYM_CODE_{START,END} 222 should be used along with unwind hints. 223 2243. Each callable function which calls another function must have the 225 correct frame pointer logic, if required by CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER or 226 the architecture's back chain rules. This can by done in asm code 227 with the FRAME_BEGIN/FRAME_END macros. 228 229 This rule ensures that frame pointer based stack traces will work as 230 designed. If function A doesn't create a stack frame before calling 231 function B, the _caller_ of function A will be skipped on the stack 232 trace. 233 2344. Indirect jumps and jumps to undefined symbols are only allowed if: 235 236 a) the jump is part of a switch statement; or 237 238 b) the jump matches sibling call semantics and the frame pointer has 239 the same value it had on function entry. 240 241 This rule is needed so that objtool can reliably analyze all of a 242 function's code paths. If a function jumps to code in another file, 243 and it's not a sibling call, objtool has no way to follow the jump 244 because it only analyzes a single file at a time. 245 2465. A callable function may not execute kernel entry/exit instructions. 247 The only code which needs such instructions is kernel entry code, 248 which shouldn't be be in callable functions anyway. 249 250 This rule is just a sanity check to ensure that callable functions 251 return normally. 252 253 254Objtool warnings 255---------------- 256 257NOTE: When requesting help with an objtool warning, please recreate with 258OBJTOOL_VERBOSE=1 (e.g., "make OBJTOOL_VERBOSE=1") and send the full 259output, including any disassembly or backtrace below the warning, to the 260objtool maintainers. 261 262For asm files, if you're getting an error which doesn't make sense, 263first make sure that the affected code follows the above rules. 264 265For C files, the common culprits are inline asm statements and calls to 266"noreturn" functions. See below for more details. 267 268Another possible cause for errors in C code is if the Makefile removes 269-fno-omit-frame-pointer or adds -fomit-frame-pointer to the gcc options. 270 271Here are some examples of common warnings reported by objtool, what 272they mean, and suggestions for how to fix them. When in doubt, ping 273the objtool maintainers. 274 275 2761. file.o: warning: objtool: func()+0x128: call without frame pointer save/setup 277 278 The func() function made a function call without first saving and/or 279 updating the frame pointer, and CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is enabled. 280 281 If the error is for an asm file, and func() is indeed a callable 282 function, add proper frame pointer logic using the FRAME_BEGIN and 283 FRAME_END macros. Otherwise, if it's not a callable function, remove 284 its ELF function annotation by using SYM_CODE_{START,END} and use the 285 manual unwind hint macros in asm/unwind_hints.h. 286 287 If it's a GCC-compiled .c file, the error may be because the function 288 uses an inline asm() statement which has a "call" instruction. An 289 asm() statement with a call instruction must declare the use of the 290 stack pointer in its output operand. On x86_64, this means adding 291 the ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT as an output constraint: 292 293 asm volatile("call func" : ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT); 294 295 Otherwise the stack frame may not get created before the call. 296 297 objtool can help with pinpointing the exact function where it happens: 298 299 $ OBJTOOL_ARGS="--verbose" make arch/x86/kvm/ 300 301 arch/x86/kvm/kvm.o: warning: objtool: .altinstr_replacement+0xc5: call without frame pointer save/setup 302 arch/x86/kvm/kvm.o: warning: objtool: em_loop.part.0+0x29: (alt) 303 arch/x86/kvm/kvm.o: warning: objtool: em_loop.part.0+0x0: <=== (sym) 304 LD [M] arch/x86/kvm/kvm-intel.o 305 0000 0000000000028220 <em_loop.part.0>: 306 0000 28220: 0f b6 47 61 movzbl 0x61(%rdi),%eax 307 0004 28224: 3c e2 cmp $0xe2,%al 308 0006 28226: 74 2c je 28254 <em_loop.part.0+0x34> 309 0008 28228: 48 8b 57 10 mov 0x10(%rdi),%rdx 310 000c 2822c: 83 f0 05 xor $0x5,%eax 311 000f 2822f: 48 c1 e0 04 shl $0x4,%rax 312 0013 28233: 25 f0 00 00 00 and $0xf0,%eax 313 0018 28238: 81 e2 d5 08 00 00 and $0x8d5,%edx 314 001e 2823e: 80 ce 02 or $0x2,%dh 315 ... 316 317 3182. file.o: warning: objtool: .text+0x53: unreachable instruction 319 320 Objtool couldn't find a code path to reach the instruction. 321 322 If the error is for an asm file, and the instruction is inside (or 323 reachable from) a callable function, the function should be annotated 324 with the SYM_FUNC_START and SYM_FUNC_END macros. 325 326 Otherwise, SYM_CODE_START can be used. In that case the code needs 327 to be annotated with unwind hint macros. 328 329 If you're sure the code won't affect the reliability of runtime stack 330 traces and want objtool to ignore it, see "Adding exceptions" below. 331 332 3333. file.o: warning: objtool: foo+0x48c: bar() missing __noreturn in .c/.h or NORETURN() in noreturns.h 334 335 The call from foo() to bar() doesn't return, but bar() is incorrectly 336 annotated. A noreturn function must be marked __noreturn in both its 337 declaration and its definition, and must have a NORETURN() annotation 338 in tools/objtool/noreturns.h. 339 340 3414. file.o: warning: objtool: func(): can't find starting instruction 342 or 343 file.o: warning: objtool: func()+0x11dd: can't decode instruction 344 345 Does the file have data in a text section? If so, that can confuse 346 objtool's instruction decoder. Move the data to a more appropriate 347 section like .data or .rodata. 348 349 3505. file.o: warning: objtool: func()+0x6: unsupported instruction in callable function 351 352 This is a kernel entry/exit instruction like sysenter or iret. Such 353 instructions aren't allowed in a callable function, and are most 354 likely part of the kernel entry code. Such code should probably be 355 placed in a SYM_CODE_{START,END} block with unwind hints. 356 357 3586. file.o: warning: objtool: func()+0x26: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame 359 360 This is a branch to an UNDEF symbol. Objtool assumed it's a 361 sibling call and detected that the stack wasn't first restored to its 362 original state. 363 364 If it's not really a sibling call, you may need to use unwind hints 365 and/or move the destination code to the local file. 366 367 If the instruction is not actually in a callable function (e.g. 368 kernel entry code), use SYM_CODE_{START,END} and unwind hints. 369 370 3717. file: warning: objtool: func()+0x5c: stack state mismatch 372 373 The instruction's frame pointer state is inconsistent, depending on 374 which execution path was taken to reach the instruction. 375 376 Make sure that, when CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is enabled, the function 377 pushes and sets up the frame pointer (for x86_64, this means rbp) at 378 the beginning of the function and pops it at the end of the function. 379 Also make sure that no other code in the function touches the frame 380 pointer. 381 382 Another possibility is that the code has some asm or inline asm which 383 does some unusual things to the stack or the frame pointer. In such 384 cases it's probably appropriate to use SYM_CODE_{START,END} with unwind 385 hints. 386 387 3888. file.o: warning: objtool: funcA() falls through to next function funcB() 389 390 This means that funcA() doesn't end with a return instruction or an 391 unconditional jump, and that objtool has determined that the function 392 can fall through into the next function. There could be different 393 reasons for this: 394 395 a) funcA()'s last instruction is a call to a "noreturn" function like 396 panic(). In this case the noreturn function needs to be added to 397 objtool's hard-coded global_noreturns array. Feel free to bug the 398 objtool maintainer, or you can submit a patch. 399 400 b) funcA() uses the unreachable() annotation in a section of code 401 that is actually reachable. 402 403 c) Some undefined behavior like divide by zero. 404 405 4069. file.o: warning: objtool: funcA() call to funcB() with UACCESS enabled 407 408 This means that an unexpected call to a non-whitelisted function exists 409 outside of arch-specific guards. 410 X86: SMAP (stac/clac): __uaccess_begin()/__uaccess_end() 411 ARM: PAN: uaccess_enable()/uaccess_disable() 412 413 These functions should be called to denote a minimal critical section around 414 access to __user variables. See also: https://lwn.net/Articles/517475/ 415 416 The intention of the warning is to prevent calls to funcB() from eventually 417 calling schedule(), potentially leaking the AC flags state, and not 418 restoring them correctly. 419 420 It also helps verify that there are no unexpected calls to funcB() which may 421 access user space pages with protections against doing so disabled. 422 423 To fix, either: 424 1) remove explicit calls to funcB() from funcA(). 425 2) add the correct guards before and after calls to low level functions like 426 __get_user_size()/__put_user_size(). 427 3) add funcB to uaccess_safe_builtin whitelist in tools/objtool/check.c, if 428 funcB obviously does not call schedule(), and is marked notrace (since 429 function tracing inserts additional calls, which is not obvious from the 430 sources). 431 43210. file.o: warning: func()+0x5c: stack layout conflict in alternatives 433 434 This means that in the use of the alternative() or ALTERNATIVE() 435 macro, the code paths have conflicting modifications to the stack. 436 The problem is that there is only one ORC unwind table, which means 437 that the ORC unwind entries must be consistent for all possible 438 instruction boundaries regardless of which code has been patched. 439 This limitation can be overcome by massaging the alternatives with 440 NOPs to shift the stack changes around so they no longer conflict. 441 442 44311. file.o: warning: unannotated intra-function call 444 445 This warning means that a direct call is done to a destination which 446 is not at the beginning of a function. If this is a legit call, you 447 can remove this warning by putting the ANNOTATE_INTRA_FUNCTION_CALL 448 directive right before the call. 449 450 45112. file.o: warning: func(): not an indirect call target 452 453 This means that objtool is running with --ibt and a function 454 expected to be an indirect call target is not. In particular, this 455 happens for init_module() or cleanup_module() if a module relies on 456 these special names and does not use module_init() / module_exit() 457 macros to create them. 458 459 460If the error doesn't seem to make sense, it could be a bug in objtool. 461Feel free to ask objtool maintainers for help. 462 463 464Adding exceptions 465----------------- 466 467If you _really_ need objtool to ignore something, and are 100% sure 468that it won't affect kernel stack traces, you can tell objtool to 469ignore it: 470 471- To skip validation of a function, use the STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD 472 macro. 473 474- To skip validation of a file, add 475 476 OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD_filename.o := y 477 478 to the Makefile. 479 480- To skip validation of a directory, add 481 482 OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD := y 483 484 to the Makefile. 485 486NOTE: OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD doesn't work for link time validation of 487vmlinux.o or a linked module. So it should only be used for files which 488aren't linked into vmlinux or a module. 489