xref: /linux/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst (revision b8f82cb0d84d00c04cdbdce42f67df71b8507e8b)

.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
.. Copyright © 2017-2020 Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
.. Copyright © 2019-2020 ANSSI
.. Copyright © 2021-2022 Microsoft Corporation

=====================================
Landlock: unprivileged access control
=====================================

:Author: Mickaël Salaün
:Date: March 2026

The goal of Landlock is to enable restriction of ambient rights (e.g. global
filesystem or network access) for a set of processes.  Because Landlock
is a stackable LSM, it makes it possible to create safe security sandboxes as
new security layers in addition to the existing system-wide access-controls.
This kind of sandbox is expected to help mitigate the security impact of bugs or
unexpected/malicious behaviors in user space applications.  Landlock empowers
any process, including unprivileged ones, to securely restrict themselves.

We can quickly make sure that Landlock is enabled in the running system by
looking for "landlock: Up and running" in kernel logs (as root):
``dmesg | grep landlock || journalctl -kb -g landlock`` .
Developers can also easily check for Landlock support with a
:ref:`related system call <landlock_abi_versions>`.
If Landlock is not currently supported, we need to
:ref:`configure the kernel appropriately <kernel_support>`.

Landlock rules
==============

A Landlock rule describes an action on an object which the process intends to
perform.  A set of rules is aggregated in a ruleset, which can then restrict
the thread enforcing it, and its future children.

The two existing types of rules are:

Filesystem rules
    For these rules, the object is a file hierarchy,
    and the related filesystem actions are defined with
    `filesystem access rights`.

Network rules (since ABI v4)
    For these rules, the object is a TCP port,
    and the related actions are defined with `network access rights`.

Defining and enforcing a security policy
----------------------------------------

We first need to define the ruleset that will contain our rules.

For this example, the ruleset will contain rules that only allow filesystem
read actions and establish a specific TCP connection. Filesystem write
actions and other TCP actions will be denied.

The ruleset then needs to handle both these kinds of actions.  This is
required for backward and forward compatibility (i.e. the kernel and user
space may not know each other's supported restrictions), hence the need
to be explicit about the denied-by-default access rights.

.. code-block:: c

    struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = {
        .handled_access_fs =
            LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_EXECUTE |
            LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_WRITE_FILE |
            LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE |
            LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_DIR |
            LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REMOVE_DIR |
            LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REMOVE_FILE |
            LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_CHAR |
            LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_DIR |
            LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_REG |
            LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_SOCK |
            LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_FIFO |
            LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_BLOCK |
            LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_SYM |
            LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER |
            LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE |
            LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV |
            LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_RESOLVE_UNIX,
        .handled_access_net =
            LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP |
            LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP,
        .scoped =
            LANDLOCK_SCOPE_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET |
            LANDLOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL,
    };

Because we may not know which kernel version an application will be executed
on, it is safer to follow a best-effort security approach.  Indeed, we
should try to protect users as much as possible whatever the kernel they are
using.

To be compatible with older Linux versions, we detect the available Landlock ABI
version, and only use the available subset of access rights:

.. code-block:: c

    int abi;

    abi = landlock_create_ruleset(NULL, 0, LANDLOCK_CREATE_RULESET_VERSION);
    if (abi < 0) {
        /* Degrades gracefully if Landlock is not handled. */
        perror("The running kernel does not enable to use Landlock");
        return 0;
    }
    switch (abi) {
    case 1:
        /* Removes LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER for ABI < 2 */
        ruleset_attr.handled_access_fs &= ~LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER;
        __attribute__((fallthrough));
    case 2:
        /* Removes LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE for ABI < 3 */
        ruleset_attr.handled_access_fs &= ~LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE;
        __attribute__((fallthrough));
    case 3:
        /* Removes network support for ABI < 4 */
        ruleset_attr.handled_access_net &=
            ~(LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP |
              LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP);
        __attribute__((fallthrough));
    case 4:
        /* Removes LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV for ABI < 5 */
        ruleset_attr.handled_access_fs &= ~LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV;
        __attribute__((fallthrough));
    case 5:
        /* Removes LANDLOCK_SCOPE_* for ABI < 6 */
        ruleset_attr.scoped &= ~(LANDLOCK_SCOPE_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET |
                                 LANDLOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL);
        __attribute__((fallthrough));
    case 6 ... 8:
        /* Removes LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_RESOLVE_UNIX for ABI < 9 */
        ruleset_attr.handled_access_fs &= ~LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_RESOLVE_UNIX;
    }

This enables the creation of an inclusive ruleset that will contain our rules.

.. code-block:: c

    int ruleset_fd;

    ruleset_fd = landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0);
    if (ruleset_fd < 0) {
        perror("Failed to create a ruleset");
        return 1;
    }

We can now add a new rule to this ruleset thanks to the returned file
descriptor referring to this ruleset.  The rule will allow reading and
executing the file hierarchy ``/usr``.  Without another rule, write actions
would then be denied by the ruleset.  To add ``/usr`` to the ruleset, we open
it with the ``O_PATH`` flag and fill the &struct landlock_path_beneath_attr with
this file descriptor.

.. code-block:: c

    int err;
    struct landlock_path_beneath_attr path_beneath = {
        .allowed_access =
            LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_EXECUTE |
            LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE |
            LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_DIR,
    };

    path_beneath.parent_fd = open("/usr", O_PATH | O_CLOEXEC);
    if (path_beneath.parent_fd < 0) {
        perror("Failed to open file");
        close(ruleset_fd);
        return 1;
    }
    err = landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_PATH_BENEATH,
                            &path_beneath, 0);
    close(path_beneath.parent_fd);
    if (err) {
        perror("Failed to update ruleset");
        close(ruleset_fd);
        return 1;
    }

It may also be required to create rules following the same logic as explained
for the ruleset creation, by filtering access rights according to the Landlock
ABI version.  In this example, this is not required because all of the requested
``allowed_access`` rights are already available in ABI 1.

For network access-control, we can add a set of rules that allow to use a port
number for a specific action: HTTPS connections.

.. code-block:: c

    struct landlock_net_port_attr net_port = {
        .allowed_access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP,
        .port = 443,
    };

    err = landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT,
                            &net_port, 0);

When passing a non-zero ``flags`` argument to ``landlock_restrict_self()``, a
similar backwards compatibility check is needed for the restrict flags
(see sys_landlock_restrict_self() documentation for available flags):

.. code-block:: c

    __u32 restrict_flags =
        LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_NEW_EXEC_ON |
        LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC;
    switch (abi) {
    case 1 ... 6:
        /* Removes logging flags for ABI < 7 */
        restrict_flags &= ~(LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SAME_EXEC_OFF |
                            LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_NEW_EXEC_ON |
                            LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SUBDOMAINS_OFF);
        __attribute__((fallthrough));
    case 7:
        /*
         * Removes multithreaded enforcement flag for ABI < 8
         *
         * WARNING: Without this flag, calling landlock_restrict_self(2) is
         * only equivalent if the calling process is single-threaded. Below
         * ABI v8 (and as of ABI v8, when not using this flag), a Landlock
         * policy would only be enforced for the calling thread and its
         * children (and not for all threads, including parents and siblings).
         */
        restrict_flags &= ~LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC;
    }

The next step is to restrict the current thread from gaining more privileges
(e.g. through a SUID binary).  We now have a ruleset with the first rule
allowing read and execute access to ``/usr`` while denying all other handled
accesses for the filesystem, and a second rule allowing HTTPS connections.

.. code-block:: c

    if (prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0)) {
        perror("Failed to restrict privileges");
        close(ruleset_fd);
        return 1;
    }

The current thread is now ready to sandbox itself with the ruleset.

.. code-block:: c

    if (landlock_restrict_self(ruleset_fd, restrict_flags)) {
        perror("Failed to enforce ruleset");
        close(ruleset_fd);
        return 1;
    }
    close(ruleset_fd);

If the ``landlock_restrict_self`` system call succeeds, the current thread is
now restricted and this policy will be enforced on all its subsequently created
children as well.  Once a thread is landlocked, there is no way to remove its
security policy; only adding more restrictions is allowed.  These threads are
now in a new Landlock domain, which is a merger of their parent one (if any)
with the new ruleset.

Full working code can be found in `samples/landlock/sandboxer.c`_.

Good practices
--------------

It is recommended to set access rights to file hierarchy leaves as much as
possible.  For instance, it is better to be able to have ``~/doc/`` as a
read-only hierarchy and ``~/tmp/`` as a read-write hierarchy, compared to
``~/`` as a read-only hierarchy and ``~/tmp/`` as a read-write hierarchy.
Following this good practice leads to self-sufficient hierarchies that do not
depend on their location (i.e. parent directories).  This is particularly
relevant when we want to allow linking or renaming.  Indeed, having consistent
access rights per directory enables changing the location of such directories
without relying on the destination directory access rights (except those that
are required for this operation, see ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER``
documentation).

Having self-sufficient hierarchies also helps to tighten the required access
rights to the minimal set of data.  This also helps avoid sinkhole directories,
i.e. directories where data can be linked to but not linked from.  However,
this depends on data organization, which might not be controlled by developers.
In this case, granting read-write access to ``~/tmp/``, instead of write-only
access, would potentially allow moving ``~/tmp/`` to a non-readable directory
and still keep the ability to list the content of ``~/tmp/``.

Layers of file path access rights
---------------------------------

Each time a thread enforces a ruleset on itself, it updates its Landlock domain
with a new layer of policy.  This complementary policy is stacked with any
other rulesets potentially already restricting this thread.  A sandboxed thread
can then safely add more constraints to itself with a new enforced ruleset.

One policy layer grants access to a file path if at least one of its rules
encountered on the path grants the access.  A sandboxed thread can only access
a file path if all its enforced policy layers grant the access as well as all
the other system access controls (e.g. filesystem DAC, other LSM policies,
etc.).

Bind mounts and OverlayFS
-------------------------

Landlock enables restricting access to file hierarchies, which means that these
access rights can be propagated with bind mounts (cf.
Documentation/filesystems/sharedsubtree.rst) but not with
Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst.

A bind mount mirrors a source file hierarchy to a destination.  The destination
hierarchy is then composed of the exact same files, on which Landlock rules can
be tied, either via the source or the destination path.  These rules restrict
access when they are encountered on a path, which means that they can restrict
access to multiple file hierarchies at the same time, whether these hierarchies
are the result of bind mounts or not.

An OverlayFS mount point consists of upper and lower layers.  These layers are
combined in a merge directory, and that merged directory becomes available at
the mount point.  This merge hierarchy may include files from the upper and
lower layers, but modifications performed on the merge hierarchy only reflect
on the upper layer.  From a Landlock policy point of view, all OverlayFS layers
and merge hierarchies are standalone and each contains their own set of files
and directories, which is different from bind mounts.  A policy restricting an
OverlayFS layer will not restrict the resulted merged hierarchy, and vice versa.
Landlock users should then only think about file hierarchies they want to allow
access to, regardless of the underlying filesystem.

Inheritance
-----------

Every new thread resulting from a :manpage:`clone(2)` inherits Landlock domain
restrictions from its parent.  This is similar to seccomp inheritance (cf.
Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst) or any other LSM dealing with
task's :manpage:`credentials(7)`.  For instance, one process's thread may apply
Landlock rules to itself, but they will not be automatically applied to other
sibling threads (unlike POSIX thread credential changes, cf.
:manpage:`nptl(7)`).

When a thread sandboxes itself, we have the guarantee that the related security
policy will stay enforced on all this thread's descendants.  This allows
creating standalone and modular security policies per application, which will
automatically be composed between themselves according to their runtime parent
policies.

Ptrace restrictions
-------------------

A sandboxed process has less privileges than a non-sandboxed process and must
then be subject to additional restrictions when manipulating another process.
To be allowed to use :manpage:`ptrace(2)` and related syscalls on a target
process, a sandboxed process should have a superset of the target process's
access rights, which means the tracee must be in a sub-domain of the tracer.

IPC scoping
-----------

Similar to the implicit `Ptrace restrictions`_, we may want to further restrict
interactions between sandboxes.  Therefore, at ruleset creation time, each
Landlock domain can restrict the scope for certain operations, so that these
operations can only reach out to processes within the same Landlock domain or in
a nested Landlock domain (the "scope").

The operations which can be scoped are:

``LANDLOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL``
    This limits the sending of signals to target processes which run within the
    same or a nested Landlock domain.

``LANDLOCK_SCOPE_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET``
    This limits the set of abstract :manpage:`unix(7)` sockets to which we can
    :manpage:`connect(2)` to socket addresses which were created by a process in
    the same or a nested Landlock domain.

    A :manpage:`sendto(2)` on a non-connected datagram socket is treated as if
    it were doing an implicit :manpage:`connect(2)` and will be blocked if the
    remote end does not stem from the same or a nested Landlock domain.

    A :manpage:`sendto(2)` on a socket which was previously connected will not
    be restricted.  This works for both datagram and stream sockets.

IPC scoping does not support exceptions via :manpage:`landlock_add_rule(2)`.
If an operation is scoped within a domain, no rules can be added to allow access
to resources or processes outside of the scope.

Truncating files
----------------

The operations covered by ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_WRITE_FILE`` and
``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE`` both change the contents of a file and sometimes
overlap in non-intuitive ways.  It is strongly recommended to always specify
both of these together (either granting both, or granting none).

A particularly surprising example is :manpage:`creat(2)`.  The name suggests
that this system call requires the rights to create and write files.  However,
it also requires the truncate right if an existing file under the same name is
already present.

It should also be noted that truncating files does not require the
``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_WRITE_FILE`` right.  Apart from the :manpage:`truncate(2)`
system call, this can also be done through :manpage:`open(2)` with the flags
``O_RDONLY | O_TRUNC``.

At the same time, on some filesystems, :manpage:`fallocate(2)` offers a way to
shorten file contents with ``FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE`` when the file is opened
for writing, sidestepping the ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE`` right.

The truncate right is associated with the opened file (see below).

Rights associated with file descriptors
---------------------------------------

When opening a file, the availability of the ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE`` and
``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV`` rights is associated with the newly created
file descriptor and will be used for subsequent truncation and ioctl attempts
using :manpage:`ftruncate(2)` and :manpage:`ioctl(2)`.  The behavior is similar
to opening a file for reading or writing, where permissions are checked during
:manpage:`open(2)`, but not during the subsequent :manpage:`read(2)` and
:manpage:`write(2)` calls.

As a consequence, it is possible that a process has multiple open file
descriptors referring to the same file, but Landlock enforces different things
when operating with these file descriptors.  This can happen when a Landlock
ruleset gets enforced and the process keeps file descriptors which were opened
both before and after the enforcement.  It is also possible to pass such file
descriptors between processes, keeping their Landlock properties, even when some
of the involved processes do not have an enforced Landlock ruleset.

Compatibility
=============

Backward and forward compatibility
----------------------------------

Landlock is designed to be compatible with past and future versions of the
kernel.  This is achieved thanks to the system call attributes and the
associated bitflags, particularly the ruleset's ``handled_access_fs``.  Making
handled access rights explicit enables the kernel and user space to have a clear
contract with each other.  This is required to make sure sandboxing will not
get stricter with a system update, which could break applications.

Developers can subscribe to the `Landlock mailing list
<https://subspace.kernel.org/lists.linux.dev.html>`_ to knowingly update and
test their applications with the latest available features.  In the interest of
users, and because they may use different kernel versions, it is strongly
encouraged to follow a best-effort security approach by checking the Landlock
ABI version at runtime and only enforcing the supported features.

.. _landlock_abi_versions:

Landlock ABI versions
---------------------

The Landlock ABI version can be read with the sys_landlock_create_ruleset()
system call:

.. code-block:: c

    int abi;

    abi = landlock_create_ruleset(NULL, 0, LANDLOCK_CREATE_RULESET_VERSION);
    if (abi < 0) {
        switch (errno) {
        case ENOSYS:
            printf("Landlock is not supported by the current kernel.\n");
            break;
        case EOPNOTSUPP:
            printf("Landlock is currently disabled.\n");
            break;
        }
        return 0;
    }
    if (abi >= 2) {
        printf("Landlock supports LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER.\n");
    }

All Landlock kernel interfaces are supported by the first ABI version unless
explicitly noted in their documentation.

Landlock errata
---------------

In addition to ABI versions, Landlock provides an errata mechanism to track
fixes for issues that may affect backwards compatibility or require userspace
awareness.  The errata bitmask can be queried using:

.. code-block:: c

    int errata;

    errata = landlock_create_ruleset(NULL, 0, LANDLOCK_CREATE_RULESET_ERRATA);
    if (errata < 0) {
        /* Landlock not available or disabled */
        return 0;
    }

The returned value is a bitmask where each bit represents a specific erratum.
If bit N is set (``errata & (1 << (N - 1))``), then erratum N has been fixed
in the running kernel.

.. warning::

   **Most applications should NOT check errata.** In 99.9% of cases, checking
   errata is unnecessary, increases code complexity, and can potentially
   decrease protection if misused.  For example, disabling the sandbox when an
   erratum is not fixed could leave the system less secure than using
   Landlock's best-effort protection.  When in doubt, ignore errata.

.. kernel-doc:: security/landlock/errata/abi-4.h
    :doc: erratum_1

.. kernel-doc:: security/landlock/errata/abi-6.h
    :doc: erratum_2

.. kernel-doc:: security/landlock/errata/abi-1.h
    :doc: erratum_3

How to check for errata
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

If you determine that your application needs to check for specific errata,
use this pattern:

.. code-block:: c

    int errata = landlock_create_ruleset(NULL, 0, LANDLOCK_CREATE_RULESET_ERRATA);
    if (errata >= 0) {
        /* Check for specific erratum (1-indexed) */
        if (errata & (1 << (erratum_number - 1))) {
            /* Erratum N is fixed in this kernel */
        } else {
            /* Erratum N is NOT fixed - consider implications for your use case */
        }
    }

**Important:** Only check errata if your application specifically relies on
behavior that changed due to the fix.  The fixes generally make Landlock less
restrictive or more correct, not more restrictive.

Kernel interface
================

Access rights
-------------

.. kernel-doc:: include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
    :identifiers: fs_access net_access scope

Creating a new ruleset
----------------------

.. kernel-doc:: security/landlock/syscalls.c
    :identifiers: sys_landlock_create_ruleset

.. kernel-doc:: include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
    :identifiers: landlock_ruleset_attr

Extending a ruleset
-------------------

.. kernel-doc:: security/landlock/syscalls.c
    :identifiers: sys_landlock_add_rule

.. kernel-doc:: include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
    :identifiers: landlock_rule_type landlock_path_beneath_attr
                  landlock_net_port_attr

Enforcing a ruleset
-------------------

.. kernel-doc:: security/landlock/syscalls.c
    :identifiers: sys_landlock_restrict_self

Current limitations
===================

Filesystem topology modification
--------------------------------

Threads sandboxed with filesystem restrictions cannot modify filesystem
topology, whether via :manpage:`mount(2)` or :manpage:`pivot_root(2)`.
However, :manpage:`chroot(2)` calls are not denied.

Special filesystems
-------------------

Access to regular files and directories can be restricted by Landlock,
according to the handled accesses of a ruleset.  However, files that do not
come from a user-visible filesystem (e.g. pipe, socket), but can still be
accessed through ``/proc/<pid>/fd/*``, cannot currently be explicitly
restricted.  Likewise, some special kernel filesystems such as nsfs, which can
be accessed through ``/proc/<pid>/ns/*``, cannot currently be explicitly
restricted.  However, thanks to the `ptrace restrictions`_, access to such
sensitive ``/proc`` files are automatically restricted according to domain
hierarchies.  Future Landlock evolutions could still enable to explicitly
restrict such paths with dedicated ruleset flags.

Ruleset layers
--------------

There is a limit of 16 layers of stacked rulesets.  This can be an issue for a
task willing to enforce a new ruleset in complement to its 16 inherited
rulesets.  Once this limit is reached, sys_landlock_restrict_self() returns
E2BIG.  It is then strongly suggested to carefully build rulesets once in the
life of a thread, especially for applications able to launch other applications
that may also want to sandbox themselves (e.g. shells, container managers,
etc.).

Memory usage
------------

Kernel memory allocated to create rulesets is accounted and can be restricted
by the Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst.

IOCTL support
-------------

The ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV`` right restricts the use of
:manpage:`ioctl(2)`, but it only applies to *newly opened* device files.  This
means specifically that pre-existing file descriptors like stdin, stdout and
stderr are unaffected.

Users should be aware that TTY devices have traditionally permitted to control
other processes on the same TTY through the ``TIOCSTI`` and ``TIOCLINUX`` IOCTL
commands.  Both of these require ``CAP_SYS_ADMIN`` on modern Linux systems, but
the behavior is configurable for ``TIOCSTI``.

On older systems, it is therefore recommended to close inherited TTY file
descriptors, or to reopen them from ``/proc/self/fd/*`` without the
``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV`` right, if possible.

Landlock's IOCTL support is coarse-grained at the moment, but may become more
fine-grained in the future.  Until then, users are advised to establish the
guarantees that they need through the file hierarchy, by only allowing the
``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV`` right on files where it is really required.

Previous limitations
====================

File renaming and linking (ABI < 2)
-----------------------------------

Because Landlock targets unprivileged access controls, it needs to properly
handle composition of rules.  Such property also implies rules nesting.
Properly handling multiple layers of rulesets, each one of them able to
restrict access to files, also implies inheritance of the ruleset restrictions
from a parent to its hierarchy.  Because files are identified and restricted by
their hierarchy, moving or linking a file from one directory to another implies
propagation of the hierarchy constraints, or restriction of these actions
according to the potentially lost constraints.  To protect against privilege
escalations through renaming or linking, and for the sake of simplicity,
Landlock previously limited linking and renaming to the same directory.
Starting with the Landlock ABI version 2, it is now possible to securely
control renaming and linking thanks to the new ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER``
access right.

File truncation (ABI < 3)
-------------------------

File truncation could not be denied before the third Landlock ABI, so it is
always allowed when using a kernel that only supports the first or second ABI.

Starting with the Landlock ABI version 3, it is now possible to securely control
truncation thanks to the new ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE`` access right.

TCP bind and connect (ABI < 4)
------------------------------

Starting with the Landlock ABI version 4, it is now possible to restrict TCP
bind and connect actions to only a set of allowed ports thanks to the new
``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP`` and ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP``
access rights.

Device IOCTL (ABI < 5)
----------------------

IOCTL operations could not be denied before the fifth Landlock ABI, so
:manpage:`ioctl(2)` is always allowed when using a kernel that only supports an
earlier ABI.

Starting with the Landlock ABI version 5, it is possible to restrict the use of
:manpage:`ioctl(2)` on character and block devices using the new
``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV`` right.

Abstract UNIX socket (ABI < 6)
------------------------------

Starting with the Landlock ABI version 6, it is possible to restrict
connections to an abstract :manpage:`unix(7)` socket by setting
``LANDLOCK_SCOPE_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET`` to the ``scoped`` ruleset attribute.

Signal (ABI < 6)
----------------

Starting with the Landlock ABI version 6, it is possible to restrict
:manpage:`signal(7)` sending by setting ``LANDLOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL`` to the
``scoped`` ruleset attribute.

Logging (ABI < 7)
-----------------

Starting with the Landlock ABI version 7, it is possible to control logging of
Landlock audit events with the ``LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SAME_EXEC_OFF``,
``LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_NEW_EXEC_ON``, and
``LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SUBDOMAINS_OFF`` flags passed to
sys_landlock_restrict_self().  See Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/landlock.rst
for more details on audit.

Thread synchronization (ABI < 8)
--------------------------------

Starting with the Landlock ABI version 8, it is now possible to
enforce Landlock rulesets across all threads of the calling process
using the ``LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC`` flag passed to
sys_landlock_restrict_self().

Pathname UNIX sockets (ABI < 9)
-------------------------------

Starting with the Landlock ABI version 9, it is possible to restrict
connections to pathname UNIX domain sockets (:manpage:`unix(7)`) using
the new ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_RESOLVE_UNIX`` right.

.. _kernel_support:

Kernel support
==============

Build time configuration
------------------------

Landlock was first introduced in Linux 5.13 but it must be configured at build
time with ``CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK=y``.  Landlock must also be enabled at boot
time like other security modules.  The list of security modules enabled by
default is set with ``CONFIG_LSM``.  The kernel configuration should then
contain ``CONFIG_LSM=landlock,[...]`` with ``[...]``  as the list of other
potentially useful security modules for the running system (see the
``CONFIG_LSM`` help).

Boot time configuration
-----------------------

If the running kernel does not have ``landlock`` in ``CONFIG_LSM``, then we can
enable Landlock by adding ``lsm=landlock,[...]`` to
Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.rst in the boot loader
configuration.

For example, if the current built-in configuration is:

.. code-block:: console

    $ zgrep -h "^CONFIG_LSM=" "/boot/config-$(uname -r)" /proc/config.gz 2>/dev/null
    CONFIG_LSM="lockdown,yama,integrity,apparmor"

...and if the cmdline doesn't contain ``landlock`` either:

.. code-block:: console

    $ sed -n 's/.*\(\<lsm=\S\+\).*/\1/p' /proc/cmdline
    lsm=lockdown,yama,integrity,apparmor

...we should configure the boot loader to set a cmdline extending the ``lsm``
list with the ``landlock,`` prefix::

  lsm=landlock,lockdown,yama,integrity,apparmor

After a reboot, we can check that Landlock is up and running by looking at
kernel logs:

.. code-block:: console

    # dmesg | grep landlock || journalctl -kb -g landlock
    [    0.000000] Command line: [...] lsm=landlock,lockdown,yama,integrity,apparmor
    [    0.000000] Kernel command line: [...] lsm=landlock,lockdown,yama,integrity,apparmor
    [    0.000000] LSM: initializing lsm=lockdown,capability,landlock,yama,integrity,apparmor
    [    0.000000] landlock: Up and running.

The kernel may be configured at build time to always load the ``lockdown`` and
``capability`` LSMs.  In that case, these LSMs will appear at the beginning of
the ``LSM: initializing`` log line as well, even if they are not configured in
the boot loader.

Network support
---------------

To be able to explicitly allow TCP operations (e.g., adding a network rule with
``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP``), the kernel must support TCP
(``CONFIG_INET=y``).  Otherwise, sys_landlock_add_rule() returns an
``EAFNOSUPPORT`` error, which can safely be ignored because this kind of TCP
operation is already not possible.

Questions and answers
=====================

What about user space sandbox managers?
---------------------------------------

Using user space processes to enforce restrictions on kernel resources can lead
to race conditions or inconsistent evaluations (i.e. `Incorrect mirroring of
the OS code and state
<https://www.ndss-symposium.org/ndss2003/traps-and-pitfalls-practical-problems-system-call-interposition-based-security-tools/>`_).

What about namespaces and containers?
-------------------------------------

Namespaces can help create sandboxes but they are not designed for
access-control and then miss useful features for such use case (e.g. no
fine-grained restrictions).  Moreover, their complexity can lead to security
issues, especially when untrusted processes can manipulate them (cf.
`Controlling access to user namespaces <https://lwn.net/Articles/673597/>`_).

How to disable Landlock audit records?
--------------------------------------

You might want to put in place filters as explained here:
Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/landlock.rst

Additional documentation
========================

* Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/landlock.rst
* Documentation/security/landlock.rst
* https://landlock.io

.. Links
.. _samples/landlock/sandboxer.c:
   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/samples/landlock/sandboxer.c