| /qemu/net/ |
| H A D | vde.c | 8d0bcba8370a4e8606dee602393a14d0c48e8bfc Mon Oct 26 22:34:56 UTC 2015 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> net: Convert to new qapi union layout
We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag
values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This
leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant
member's name.
Make the conversion to the new layout for net-related code.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-18-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked slightly]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | l2tpv3.c | 8d0bcba8370a4e8606dee602393a14d0c48e8bfc Mon Oct 26 22:34:56 UTC 2015 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> net: Convert to new qapi union layout
We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag
values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This
leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant
member's name.
Make the conversion to the new layout for net-related code.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-18-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked slightly]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | hub.c | 8d0bcba8370a4e8606dee602393a14d0c48e8bfc Mon Oct 26 22:34:56 UTC 2015 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> net: Convert to new qapi union layout
We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag
values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This
leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant
member's name.
Make the conversion to the new layout for net-related code.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-18-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked slightly]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | tap-win32.c | 8d0bcba8370a4e8606dee602393a14d0c48e8bfc Mon Oct 26 22:34:56 UTC 2015 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> net: Convert to new qapi union layout
We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag
values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This
leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant
member's name.
Make the conversion to the new layout for net-related code.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-18-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked slightly]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | dump.c | 8d0bcba8370a4e8606dee602393a14d0c48e8bfc Mon Oct 26 22:34:56 UTC 2015 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> net: Convert to new qapi union layout
We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag
values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This
leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant
member's name.
Make the conversion to the new layout for net-related code.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-18-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked slightly]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | socket.c | 8d0bcba8370a4e8606dee602393a14d0c48e8bfc Mon Oct 26 22:34:56 UTC 2015 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> net: Convert to new qapi union layout
We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag
values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This
leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant
member's name.
Make the conversion to the new layout for net-related code.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-18-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked slightly]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | vhost-user.c | 8d0bcba8370a4e8606dee602393a14d0c48e8bfc Mon Oct 26 22:34:56 UTC 2015 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> net: Convert to new qapi union layout
We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag
values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This
leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant
member's name.
Make the conversion to the new layout for net-related code.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-18-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked slightly]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | tap.c | 8d0bcba8370a4e8606dee602393a14d0c48e8bfc Mon Oct 26 22:34:56 UTC 2015 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> net: Convert to new qapi union layout
We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag
values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This
leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant
member's name.
Make the conversion to the new layout for net-related code.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-18-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked slightly]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | slirp.c | 8d0bcba8370a4e8606dee602393a14d0c48e8bfc Mon Oct 26 22:34:56 UTC 2015 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> net: Convert to new qapi union layout
We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag
values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This
leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant
member's name.
Make the conversion to the new layout for net-related code.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-18-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked slightly]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | net.c | 8d0bcba8370a4e8606dee602393a14d0c48e8bfc Mon Oct 26 22:34:56 UTC 2015 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> net: Convert to new qapi union layout
We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag
values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This
leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant
member's name.
Make the conversion to the new layout for net-related code.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-18-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked slightly]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
|