Lines Matching full:t9
1288 seq->t9 = REG_FIELD_GET(PANEL_LIGHT_OFF_DELAY_MASK, pp_off); in intel_pps_readout_hw_state()
1308 drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "%s t1_t3 %d t8 %d t9 %d t10 %d t11_t12 %d\n", in intel_pps_dump_state()
1310 seq->t1_t3, seq->t8, seq->t9, seq->t10, seq->t11_t12); in intel_pps_dump_state()
1322 if (hw.t1_t3 != sw->t1_t3 || hw.t8 != sw->t8 || hw.t9 != sw->t9 || in intel_pps_verify_state()
1332 return delays->t1_t3 || delays->t8 || delays->t9 || in pps_delays_valid()
1394 spec->t9 = 50 * 10; /* no limit for t9, make it symmetric with t8 */ in pps_init_delays_spec()
1428 assign_final(t9); in pps_init_delays()
1436 intel_dp->pps.backlight_off_delay = get_delay(t9); in pps_init_delays()
1453 * on them. For T8, even BSpec recommends doing it. For T9, if we in pps_init_delays()
1459 final->t9 = 1; in pps_init_delays()
1510 pp_off = REG_FIELD_PREP(PANEL_LIGHT_OFF_DELAY_MASK, seq->t9) | in pps_init_registers()