Lines Matching full:we
70 * have an existing running transaction: we only make a new transaction
71 * once we have started to commit the old one).
74 * The journal MUST be locked. We don't perform atomic mallocs on the
75 * new transaction and we can't block without protecting against other
175 * We don't call jbd2_might_wait_for_commit() here as there's no in wait_transaction_switching()
198 * Wait until we can add credits for handle to the running transaction. Called
200 * transaction. Returns 1 if we had to wait, j_state_lock is dropped, and
204 * value, we need to fake out sparse so ti doesn't complain about a
229 * potential buffers requested by this operation, we need to in add_transaction_credits()
236 * then start to commit it: we can then go back and in add_transaction_credits()
268 * We must therefore ensure the necessary space in the journal in add_transaction_credits()
285 /* No reservation? We are done... */ in add_transaction_credits()
290 /* We allow at most half of a transaction to be reserved */ in add_transaction_credits()
341 * transaction early if there are high chances we'll need it. If we in start_this_handle()
342 * guess wrong, we'll retry or free unused transaction. in start_this_handle()
346 * If __GFP_FS is not present, then we may be being called from in start_this_handle()
347 * inside the fs writeback layer, so we MUST NOT fail. in start_this_handle()
360 * We need to hold j_state_lock until t_updates has been incremented, in start_this_handle()
375 * we allow reserved handles to proceed because otherwise commit could in start_this_handle()
402 /* We may have dropped j_state_lock - restart in that case */ in start_this_handle()
413 * We have handle reserved so we are allowed to join T_LOCKED in start_this_handle()
414 * transaction and we don't have to check for transaction size in start_this_handle()
415 * and journal space. But we still have to wait while running in start_this_handle()
522 * @nblocks: number of block buffer we might modify
524 * We make sure that the transaction can guarantee at least nblocks of
525 * modified buffers in the log. We block until the log can guarantee
526 * that much space. Additionally, if rsv_blocks > 0, we also create another
707 * Subtract necessary revoke descriptor blocks from handle credits. We in stop_this_handle()
736 * Scope of the GFP_NOFS context is over here and so we can restore the in stop_this_handle()
756 * credits. We preserve reserved handle if there's any attached to the
768 /* If we've had an abort of any type, don't even think about in jbd2__journal_restart()
784 * TODO: If we use READ_ONCE / WRITE_ONCE for j_commit_request we can in jbd2__journal_restart()
825 * jbd2_journal_free_transaction(). This can only happen when we in jbd2_journal_wait_updates()
827 * Hence we should everytime retrieve new j_running_transaction in jbd2_journal_wait_updates()
880 * We have now established a barrier against other normal updates, but in jbd2_journal_lock_updates()
881 * we also need to barrier against other jbd2_journal_lock_updates() calls in jbd2_journal_lock_updates()
882 * to make sure that we serialise special journal-locked operations in jbd2_journal_lock_updates()
924 /* Fire data frozen trigger just before we copy the data */ in jbd2_freeze_jh_data()
930 * Now that the frozen data is saved off, we need to store any matching in jbd2_freeze_jh_data()
938 * is nothing we need to do. If it is already part of a prior
939 * transaction which we are still committing to disk, then we need to
940 * make sure that we do not overwrite the old copy: we do copy-out to
941 * preserve the copy going to disk. We also account the buffer against
977 /* We now hold the buffer lock so it is safe to query the buffer in do_get_write_access()
982 * Otherwise, it is journaled, and we don't expect dirty buffers in do_get_write_access()
993 * We need to clean the dirty flag and we must do it under the in do_get_write_access()
994 * buffer lock to be sure we don't race with running write-out. in do_get_write_access()
1001 * ever called for it. So we need to set jbddirty bit here to in do_get_write_access()
1033 * If the buffer is not journaled right now, we need to make sure it in do_get_write_access()
1067 * If there is already a copy-out version of this buffer, then we don't in do_get_write_access()
1081 * There is one case we have to be very careful about. If the in do_get_write_access()
1083 * and has NOT made a copy-out, then we cannot modify the buffer in do_get_write_access()
1086 * primary copy is already going to disk then we cannot do copy-out in do_get_write_access()
1099 * past that stage (here we use the fact that BH_Shadow is set under in do_get_write_access()
1101 * point we know the buffer doesn't have BH_Shadow set). in do_get_write_access()
1103 * Subtle point, though: if this is a get_undo_access, then we will be in do_get_write_access()
1105 * committed_data record after the transaction, so we HAVE to force the in do_get_write_access()
1134 * If we are about to journal a buffer, then any revoke pending on it is in do_get_write_access()
1159 * RCU protects us from dereferencing freed pages. So the checks we do in jbd2_write_access_granted()
1161 * & reallocated while we work with it. So we have to be careful. When in jbd2_write_access_granted()
1162 * we see jh attached to the running transaction, we know it must stay in jbd2_write_access_granted()
1164 * will be attached to the same bh while we run. However it can in jbd2_write_access_granted()
1166 * just after we get pointer to it from bh. So we have to be careful in jbd2_write_access_granted()
1167 * and recheck jh still belongs to our bh before we return success. in jbd2_write_access_granted()
1184 * 1) Make sure to fetch b_bh after we did previous checks so that we in jbd2_write_access_granted()
1186 * while we were checking. Paired with implicit barrier in that path. in jbd2_write_access_granted()
1209 * because we're ``write()ing`` a buffer which is also part of a shared mapping.
1226 * In this case, we could read old data from disk and write in jbd2_journal_get_write_access()
1238 /* We do not want to get caught playing with fields which the in jbd2_journal_get_write_access()
1249 * (ie. getblk() returned a new buffer and we are going to populate it
1250 * manually rather than reading off disk), then we need to keep the
1252 * data. In this case, we should be able to make the assertion that
1301 * the commit finished, we've filed the buffer for in jbd2_journal_get_create_access()
1302 * checkpointing and marked it dirty. Now we are reallocating in jbd2_journal_get_create_access()
1327 * blocks which contain freed but then revoked metadata. We need in jbd2_journal_get_create_access()
1328 * to cancel the revoke in case we end up freeing it yet again in jbd2_journal_get_create_access()
1347 * this for freeing and allocating space, we have to make sure that we
1349 * since if we overwrote that space we would make the delete
1356 * as we know that the buffer has definitely been committed to disk.
1358 * We never need to know which transaction the committed data is part
1361 * we can discard the old committed data pointer.
1381 * Do this first --- it can drop the journal lock, so we want to in jbd2_journal_get_undo_access()
1476 * current committing transaction (in which case we should have frozen
1477 * data present for that commit). In that case, we don't relink the
1492 * We don't grab jh reference here since the buffer must be part in jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata()
1500 * This and the following assertions are unreliable since we may see jh in jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata()
1501 * in inconsistent state unless we grab bh_state lock. But this is in jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata()
1564 * I _think_ we're OK here with SMP barriers - a mistaken decision will in jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata()
1565 * result in this test being false, so we go in and take the locks. in jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata()
1617 /* And this case is illegal: we can't reuse another in jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata()
1641 * We can only do the bforget if there are no commits pending against the
1642 * buffer. If the buffer is dirty in the current running transaction we
1688 * The buffer's going from the transaction, we must drop in jbd2_journal_forget()
1696 /* If we are forgetting a buffer which is already part in jbd2_journal_forget()
1697 * of this transaction, then we can just drop it from in jbd2_journal_forget()
1705 * we only want to drop a reference if this transaction in jbd2_journal_forget()
1712 * We are no longer going to journal this buffer. in jbd2_journal_forget()
1714 * important to the buffer: the delete that we are now in jbd2_journal_forget()
1716 * committing, we can satisfy the buffer's checkpoint. in jbd2_journal_forget()
1718 * So, if we have a checkpoint on the buffer, we should in jbd2_journal_forget()
1720 * we know to remove the checkpoint after we commit. in jbd2_journal_forget()
1736 * (committing) transaction, we can't drop it yet... */ in jbd2_journal_forget()
1738 /* ... but we CAN drop it from the new transaction through in jbd2_journal_forget()
1764 * transaction, we can just drop it now if it has no in jbd2_journal_forget()
1784 * The buffer is still not written to disk, we should in jbd2_journal_forget()
1810 * There is not much action needed here. We just return any remaining
1812 * complication is that we need to start a commit operation if the
1862 * arrive. It doesn't cost much - we're about to run a commit in jbd2_journal_stop()
1866 * We try and optimize the sleep time against what the in jbd2_journal_stop()
1872 * join the transaction. We achieve this by measuring how in jbd2_journal_stop()
1875 * < commit time then we sleep for the delta and commit. This in jbd2_journal_stop()
1880 * to perform a synchronous write. We do this to detect the in jbd2_journal_stop()
1917 * If the handle is marked SYNC, we need to set another commit in jbd2_journal_stop()
1918 * going! We also want to force a commit if the transaction is too in jbd2_journal_stop()
1942 * committing on us and eventually disappear. So we must not in jbd2_journal_stop()
2087 * This function returns non-zero if we wish try_to_free_buffers()
2088 * to be called. We do this if the page is releasable by try_to_free_buffers().
2089 * We also do it if the page has locked or dirty buffers and the caller wants
2092 * This complicates JBD locking somewhat. We aren't protected by the
2093 * BKL here. We wish to remove the buffer from its committing or
2100 * buffer. So we need to lock against that. jbd2_journal_dirty_data()
2107 * cannot happen because we never reallocate freed data as metadata
2126 * We take our own ref against the journal_head here to avoid in jbd2_journal_try_to_free_buffers()
2155 * checkpoint list we need to record it on this transaction's forget list
2157 * this transaction commits. If the buffer isn't on a checkpoint list, we
2174 * We don't want to write the buffer anymore, clear the in __dispose_buffer()
2175 * bit so that we don't confuse checks in in __dispose_buffer()
2196 * i_size must be updated on disk before we start calling invalidate_folio
2201 * invariant, we can be sure that it is safe to throw away any buffers
2203 * we know that the data will not be needed.
2205 * Note however that we can *not* throw away data belonging to the
2221 * The above applies mainly to ordered data mode. In writeback mode we
2223 * particular we don't guarantee that new dirty data is flushed before
2233 * We're outside-transaction here. Either or both of j_running_transaction
2247 * buffers cannot be stolen by try_to_free_buffers as long as we are in journal_unmap_buffer()
2255 /* OK, we have data buffer in journaled mode */ in journal_unmap_buffer()
2261 * We cannot remove the buffer from checkpoint lists until the in journal_unmap_buffer()
2266 * the buffer will be lost. On the other hand we have to in journal_unmap_buffer()
2275 * Also we have to clear buffer_mapped flag of a truncated buffer in journal_unmap_buffer()
2278 * buffer_head can be reused when the file is extended again. So we end in journal_unmap_buffer()
2286 * has no checkpoint link, then we can zap it: in journal_unmap_buffer()
2287 * it's a writeback-mode buffer so we don't care in journal_unmap_buffer()
2295 /* bdflush has written it. We can drop it now */ in journal_unmap_buffer()
2314 * orphan record which we wrote for this file must have in journal_unmap_buffer()
2315 * passed into commit. We must attach this buffer to in journal_unmap_buffer()
2324 * committed. We can cleanse this buffer */ in journal_unmap_buffer()
2333 * The buffer is committing, we simply cannot touch in journal_unmap_buffer()
2334 * it. If the page is straddling i_size we have to wait in journal_unmap_buffer()
2348 * OK, buffer won't be reachable after truncate. We just clear in journal_unmap_buffer()
2365 * We are writing our own transaction's data, not any in journal_unmap_buffer()
2367 * (remember that we expect the filesystem to have set in journal_unmap_buffer()
2369 * expose the disk blocks we are discarding here.) */ in journal_unmap_buffer()
2431 /* We will potentially be playing with lists other than just the in jbd2_journal_invalidate_folio()
2487 * For metadata buffers, we track dirty bit in buffer_jbddirty in __jbd2_journal_file_buffer()
2488 * instead of buffer_dirty. We should not see a dirty bit set in __jbd2_journal_file_buffer()
2489 * here because we clear it in do_get_write_access but e.g. in __jbd2_journal_file_buffer()
2491 * so we try to gracefully handle that. in __jbd2_journal_file_buffer()
2586 * We set b_transaction here because b_next_transaction will inherit in __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer()
2607 * __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer() with necessary locking added. We take our
2608 * bh reference so that we can safely unlock bh.
2652 /* Is inode already attached where we need it? */ in jbd2_journal_file_inode()
2658 * We only ever set this variable to 1 so the test is safe. Since in jbd2_journal_file_inode()
2659 * t_need_data_flush is likely to be set, we do the test to save some in jbd2_journal_file_inode()
2701 * committing, we cannot discard the data by truncate until we have
2702 * written them. Otherwise if we crashed after the transaction with
2704 * committed, we could see stale data in block A. This function is a
2711 * avoids the race that someone writes new data and we start
2715 * happens in the same transaction as write --- we don't have to write
2729 * enough that the transaction was not committing before we started in jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_truncate()