Lines Matching full:would

77     the parent of object and it would have to lock the parent).
110 Otherwise the set of contended objects would be infinite - each of them
111 would have a contended child and we had assumed that no object is its
117 would again have an infinite set of contended objects).  But that
128 source), such loop would have to contain these objects and the rest of it
129 would have to exist before rename().  I.e. at the moment of loop creation
130 rename() responsible for that would be holding filesystem lock and new parent
131 would have to be equal to or a descendent of source.  But that means that
133 we had acquired filesystem lock and rename() would fail with -ELOOP in that
139 also preserved by all operations (cross-directory rename on a tree that would
145 in is_subdir() that would make it work even in presence of such beasts.