Revision tags: v2.6.24-rc8 |
|
#
cf059462 |
| 08-Jan-2008 |
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> |
hfs: handle more on-disk corruptions without oopsing
hfs seems prone to bad things when it encounters on disk corruption. Many values are read from disk, and used as lengths to memcpy, as an exampl
hfs: handle more on-disk corruptions without oopsing
hfs seems prone to bad things when it encounters on disk corruption. Many values are read from disk, and used as lengths to memcpy, as an example. This patch fixes up several of these problematic cases.
o sanity check the on-disk maximum key lengths on mount (these are set to a defined value at mkfs time and shouldn't differ) o check on-disk node keylens against the maximum key length for each tree o fix hfs_btree_open so that going out via free_tree: doesn't wind up in hfs_releasepage, which wants to follow the very pointer we were trying to set up: HFS_SB(sb)->cat_tree = hfs_btree_open() ... failure gets to hfs_releasepage and tries to follow HFS_SB(sb)->cat_tree
Tested with the fsfuzzer; it survives more than it used to.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v2.6.24-rc7, v2.6.24-rc6, v2.6.24-rc5, v2.6.24-rc4, v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.24-rc2, v2.6.24-rc1, v2.6.23, v2.6.23-rc9, v2.6.23-rc8, v2.6.23-rc7, v2.6.23-rc6, v2.6.23-rc5, v2.6.23-rc4, v2.6.23-rc3, v2.6.23-rc2, v2.6.23-rc1, v2.6.22, v2.6.22-rc7, v2.6.22-rc6, v2.6.22-rc5, v2.6.22-rc4, v2.6.22-rc3, v2.6.22-rc2, v2.6.22-rc1, v2.6.21, v2.6.21-rc7, v2.6.21-rc6, v2.6.21-rc5, v2.6.21-rc4, v2.6.21-rc3, v2.6.21-rc2, v2.6.21-rc1, v2.6.20, v2.6.20-rc7, v2.6.20-rc6, v2.6.20-rc5, v2.6.20-rc4, v2.6.20-rc3, v2.6.20-rc2, v2.6.20-rc1, v2.6.19, v2.6.19-rc6, v2.6.19-rc5, v2.6.19-rc4, v2.6.19-rc3, v2.6.19-rc2, v2.6.19-rc1, v2.6.18, v2.6.18-rc7, v2.6.18-rc6, v2.6.18-rc5, v2.6.18-rc4, v2.6.18-rc3, v2.6.18-rc2, v2.6.18-rc1, v2.6.17, v2.6.17-rc6, v2.6.17-rc5, v2.6.17-rc4, v2.6.17-rc3, v2.6.17-rc2, v2.6.17-rc1, v2.6.16, v2.6.16-rc6, v2.6.16-rc5, v2.6.16-rc4, v2.6.16-rc3, v2.6.16-rc2 |
|
#
292dd876 |
| 27-Jan-2006 |
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> |
Pull release into acpica branch
|
#
2af5920b |
| 27-Jan-2006 |
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> |
Merge branch 'master'
|
#
71e834f5 |
| 27-Jan-2006 |
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> |
Merge branch 'master'
|
#
97309d1a |
| 27-Jan-2006 |
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> |
Merge branch 'upstream-fixes'
|
#
0a0fc0dd |
| 24-Jan-2006 |
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com> |
Merge with /home/shaggy/git/linus-clean/
|
#
044399b2 |
| 20-Jan-2006 |
David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> |
Merge branch 'master'
|
#
944d7955 |
| 19-Jan-2006 |
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cantab.net> |
Merge branch 'master' of /usr/src/ntfs-2.6/
|
#
7cf3cc30 |
| 19-Jan-2006 |
Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> |
[PATCH] hfs: cleanup HFS prints
Add the log level and a "hfs: " prefix to all kernel prints.
Signed-off-by: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-
[PATCH] hfs: cleanup HFS prints
Add the log level and a "hfs: " prefix to all kernel prints.
Signed-off-by: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v2.6.16-rc1, v2.6.15, v2.6.15-rc7, v2.6.15-rc6, v2.6.15-rc5, v2.6.15-rc4, v2.6.15-rc3, v2.6.15-rc2, v2.6.15-rc1, v2.6.14, v2.6.14-rc5, v2.6.14-rc4, v2.6.14-rc3, v2.6.14-rc2, v2.6.14-rc1, v2.6.13, v2.6.13-rc7, v2.6.13-rc6, v2.6.13-rc5, v2.6.13-rc4, v2.6.13-rc3, v2.6.13-rc2, v2.6.13-rc1, v2.6.12, v2.6.12-rc6, v2.6.12-rc5, v2.6.12-rc4, v2.6.12-rc3, v2.6.12-rc2 |
|
#
1da177e4 |
| 16-Apr-2005 |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org> |
Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in
Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
show more ...
|